Timeline for Relationship between sectional curvature, bisectional curvature and conjugate points
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 12, 2017 at 3:19 | comment | added | YangMills | I have not seen the expression "constant bisectional curvature" anywhere else, only in Tian's papers. Everybody else uses "constant holomorphic sectional curvature" | |
May 12, 2017 at 3:18 | comment | added | YangMills | To me the only meaning that "constant bisectional curvature" could possibly have is that the bisectional curvature $R(X,JX,JY,Y)$ (or if you prefer $R_{i \bar{j} k \bar{\ell}}\xi^i \bar{\xi}^j \zeta^k \bar{\zeta}^\ell$) evaluated on pairs of unit vectors $X,Y$ (or unit $(1,0)$ vectors $\xi,\zeta$) is constant independent of the vectors and of the points, and this cannot happen unless $g$ is flat. | |
May 11, 2017 at 8:51 | comment | added | diverietti | I don't think that Tian's book has a typo about that. He defines what he (but not only him, it is quite standard, isn't it?) means by "constant holomorphic bisectional curvature". The definition is modelled exactly on the curvature of complex space forms, that is $R_{i\bar j k\bar l}=\lambda(g_{i\bar j}g_{k\bar l}+g_{i\bar l}g_{k\bar j})$. | |
Sep 13, 2012 at 9:01 | vote | accept | Reza | ||
Sep 12, 2012 at 14:25 | history | edited | YangMills | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 260 characters in body
|
Sep 12, 2012 at 14:23 | comment | added | YangMills | Yes, of course, sorry about that. I will edit my answer accordingly. | |
Sep 12, 2012 at 8:39 | comment | added | Benoît Kloeckner | Of course, it leaves flat spaces that do have constant bisectional curvature, right? | |
Sep 11, 2012 at 0:04 | history | answered | YangMills | CC BY-SA 3.0 |