Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 12, 2017 at 3:19 comment added YangMills I have not seen the expression "constant bisectional curvature" anywhere else, only in Tian's papers. Everybody else uses "constant holomorphic sectional curvature"
May 12, 2017 at 3:18 comment added YangMills To me the only meaning that "constant bisectional curvature" could possibly have is that the bisectional curvature $R(X,JX,JY,Y)$ (or if you prefer $R_{i \bar{j} k \bar{\ell}}\xi^i \bar{\xi}^j \zeta^k \bar{\zeta}^\ell$) evaluated on pairs of unit vectors $X,Y$ (or unit $(1,0)$ vectors $\xi,\zeta$) is constant independent of the vectors and of the points, and this cannot happen unless $g$ is flat.
May 11, 2017 at 8:51 comment added diverietti I don't think that Tian's book has a typo about that. He defines what he (but not only him, it is quite standard, isn't it?) means by "constant holomorphic bisectional curvature". The definition is modelled exactly on the curvature of complex space forms, that is $R_{i\bar j k\bar l}=\lambda(g_{i\bar j}g_{k\bar l}+g_{i\bar l}g_{k\bar j})$.
Sep 13, 2012 at 9:01 vote accept Reza
Sep 12, 2012 at 14:25 history edited YangMills CC BY-SA 3.0
added 260 characters in body
Sep 12, 2012 at 14:23 comment added YangMills Yes, of course, sorry about that. I will edit my answer accordingly.
Sep 12, 2012 at 8:39 comment added Benoît Kloeckner Of course, it leaves flat spaces that do have constant bisectional curvature, right?
Sep 11, 2012 at 0:04 history answered YangMills CC BY-SA 3.0