Timeline for 6j symbols trouble when irrep multiplicity >1
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2015 at 22:49 | comment | added | Matthew Titsworth | Not to bump a dead thread, but in case it is still needed and for anyone else who may run across this, On Arithmetic Modular Categories gives a through description and derivation for moving between 10j-Symbols and fusion categories. | |
| Sep 11, 2012 at 8:49 | comment | added | Hauke Reddmann | @Kevin (or anybody else) - do you know a good reference to start? (From my spectroscopic work, I'm accustomed to additional quantum numbers, like "seniority" or an additional counter index for equal $^{2S+1}L_J$ terms, but luckily, I'm exclusively working in SU(2) :-) | |
| Sep 10, 2012 at 16:42 | comment | added | Kevin Walker | 6j symbols should really be called 6j+4k symbols, where the 4 k's index bases of the trivalent vertex spaces. It's a weird, special fact about SU(2) that you can ignore the k's. In general this is almost never the case. | |
| Sep 10, 2012 at 15:05 | comment | added | Noah Snyder | I've always found 6j symbols when there's multiplicities very confusing. | |
| Sep 10, 2012 at 12:57 | comment | added | Bruce Westbury | There is nothing wrong with your logic. This is something you have to live with. | |
| Sep 10, 2012 at 12:54 | history | asked | Hauke Reddmann | CC BY-SA 3.0 |