Timeline for Why are Gromov-Witten invariants of K3 surfaces trivial?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2012 at 13:28 | answer | added | Aleksey | timeline score: 5 | |
| Sep 11, 2012 at 16:49 | answer | added | Jim Bryan | timeline score: 9 | |
| Sep 11, 2012 at 10:27 | history | edited | Gil Kalai | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Sep 11, 2012 at 1:07 | comment | added | Atsushi Kanazawa | I wonder what happens if we restrict ourselves to algebraic K3 surfaces, or lattice polarized ones. | |
| Sep 10, 2012 at 23:25 | comment | added | Ian Agol | The Donaldson invariants are non-trivial for K3 surfaces; however this is probably not related to Donaldson-Thomas invariants. | |
| Sep 10, 2012 at 11:02 | answer | added | Jonny Evans | timeline score: 21 | |
| Sep 10, 2012 at 9:04 | history | asked | Daniel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |