Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 9, 2013 at 19:30 comment added JHM @DerekHolt: do you have a reference for your claim on the largest finite subgroup?
Sep 12, 2012 at 21:32 comment added Ian Agol The maximal groups in dimensions $\leq 9$ are analyzed in these papers: ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=551303
Sep 11, 2012 at 21:30 answer added Ralph timeline score: 7
Sep 5, 2012 at 12:55 comment added Ian Agol The split Bieberbach groups are counted in 3D as 73 according to Wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_group These seem to be called arithmetic crystal classes, or symmorphic, at least in 3D.
Sep 5, 2012 at 12:42 comment added Ian Agol I think the number of Bieberbach groups gives an upper bound. For each finite subgroup $G< GL_n(\mathbb{Z})$, one obtains a Bieberbach group $G \ltimes \mathbb{Z}^n$. Moreover, if two Bieberbach groups are obtained this way, then by Bieberbach's theorem, they are affinely equivalent. Since the $\mathbb{Z}^n$ subgroup is a maximal subgroup of translations, this means the affine map must send $\mathbb{Z}^n$ to $\mathbb{Z}^n$, so it lies in $GL_n(\mathbb{Z})$. However, this will be an overcount, since there are Bieberbach groups which are not of this form (e.g. Klein bottle group), ie not split.
Sep 5, 2012 at 3:06 comment added Tom Goodwillie The number of conjugacy classes of finite subgroups of $GL_n(\mathbb Q)$ is a lower bound, and this number might be a little easier to think about.
Sep 4, 2012 at 20:45 history edited Gregor Samsa CC BY-SA 3.0
added 75 characters in body
Sep 4, 2012 at 20:42 comment added Gregor Samsa @David Speyer: You're right, it doesn't make sense to speak about big conjugacy classes. Since I was thinking about space group and their arithmetic equivalence for the last few days, things got mixed up in my head. Thanks for pointing that out.
Sep 4, 2012 at 19:14 comment added Derek Holt The largest finite subgroup is the orthogonal group of order $2^nn!$, at least for all $n > 10$. These questions have been discussed on MO before, but I do not believe that any asymptotic results on the number of classes are known.
Sep 4, 2012 at 15:29 comment added Will Sawin If I counted right $GL_1$ has $2$ and $GL_2$ has $9$. The number should increase fairly rapidly with $n$.
Sep 4, 2012 at 14:19 comment added David E Speyer I am confused by question (2). These conjugacy classes are infinite, so how are you measuring their size?
Sep 4, 2012 at 12:59 history edited Gregor Samsa CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1 characters in body
Sep 4, 2012 at 12:38 history asked Gregor Samsa CC BY-SA 3.0