Timeline for a question on TITS' note "Reductive groups over local fields"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2012 at 5:56 | comment | added | grp | @Igor Rivin: My belief was based on my expertise in the relevant math, but I concede it was just an educated guess (which seems to have been correct, but that's beside the point). More importantly, the mixture of English errors in the question and the "name" of the OP suggest that English fluency (as opposed to English proficiency) may be missing here, hence my Jeopardy joke. Math is universal, yet MO practice leaves little choice but to post questions in English, and I think in cases lacking English fluency one should cut the OP some slack if an expert can surmise the likely intent. | |
| Sep 9, 2012 at 0:28 | comment | added | Igor Rivin | @grp: And why do you believe your statement is correct? If you read "how to ask", you will note the request for precision. If you can't even formulate your posting in the form of a question, you are not being precise. | |
| Sep 7, 2012 at 19:31 | answer | added | fherzig | timeline score: 10 | |
| Sep 7, 2012 at 5:58 | vote | accept | ronggang | ||
| Sep 3, 2012 at 21:48 | comment | added | grp | @Igor Rivin: the question is how to define $\phi$. Although it might make Alex Trebek unhappy, on MO questions don't need to be stated in the form of a question. :) | |
| Sep 3, 2012 at 19:06 | answer | added | grp | timeline score: 8 | |
| Sep 3, 2012 at 17:09 | comment | added | Igor Rivin | I don't see a question anywhere. | |
| Sep 3, 2012 at 16:50 | history | asked | ronggang | CC BY-SA 3.0 |