Skip to main content
added 17 characters in body
Source Link
Francesco Polizzi
  • 66.3k
  • 5
  • 180
  • 283

In Fulton's book Intersection Theory, Theorem 15.3 and Example 15.3.1 (p. 297 of my edition) it is proven, by using GRR, that $$c_k(\mathscr{O}_Z)=(-1)^{k-1}(k-1)![Z].$$ By using the short exact sequence $$0 \to \mathscr{I}_Z \to \mathscr{O}_X \to \mathscr{O}_Z \to 0$$ one haswe obtain $1=c(\mathscr{O}_X)=c(\mathscr{O}_Z)c(\mathscr{I}_Z)$ and this impliesin turn implies $$c_k(\mathscr{I}_Z)=(-1)^k (k-1)![Z].$$

In Fulton's book Intersection Theory, Theorem 15.3 and Example 15.3.1 (p. 297 of my edition) it is proven, by using GRR, that $$c_k(\mathscr{O}_Z)=(-1)^{k-1}(k-1)![Z].$$ By the short exact sequence $$0 \to \mathscr{I}_Z \to \mathscr{O}_X \to \mathscr{O}_Z \to 0$$ one has $1=c(\mathscr{O}_X)=c(\mathscr{O}_Z)c(\mathscr{I}_Z)$ and this implies $$c_k(\mathscr{I}_Z)=(-1)^k (k-1)![Z].$$

In Fulton's book Intersection Theory, Theorem 15.3 and Example 15.3.1 (p. 297 of my edition) it is proven, by using GRR, that $$c_k(\mathscr{O}_Z)=(-1)^{k-1}(k-1)![Z].$$ By using the short exact sequence $$0 \to \mathscr{I}_Z \to \mathscr{O}_X \to \mathscr{O}_Z \to 0$$ we obtain $1=c(\mathscr{O}_X)=c(\mathscr{O}_Z)c(\mathscr{I}_Z)$ and this in turn implies $$c_k(\mathscr{I}_Z)=(-1)^k (k-1)![Z].$$

edited body
Source Link
Francesco Polizzi
  • 66.3k
  • 5
  • 180
  • 283

In Fulton's book "Intersection Theory"Intersection Theory, Theorem 15.3 and Example 15.3.1 (p. 297 of my edition) it is proven, by using GRR, that $$c_k(\mathscr{O}_Z)=(-1)^{k-1}(k-1)![Z].$$ By the short exact sequence $$0 \to \mathscr{I}_Z \to \mathscr{O}_X \to \mathscr{O}_Z \to 0$$ one has $1=c(\mathscr{O}_X)=c(\mathscr{O}_Z)c(\mathscr{I}_Z)$ and this implies $$c_k(\mathscr{I}_Z)=(-1)^k (k-1)![Z].$$

In Fulton's book "Intersection Theory", Theorem 15.3 and Example 15.3.1 (p. 297 of my edition) it is proven, by using GRR, that $$c_k(\mathscr{O}_Z)=(-1)^{k-1}(k-1)![Z].$$ By the short exact sequence $$0 \to \mathscr{I}_Z \to \mathscr{O}_X \to \mathscr{O}_Z \to 0$$ one has $1=c(\mathscr{O}_X)=c(\mathscr{O}_Z)c(\mathscr{I}_Z)$ and this implies $$c_k(\mathscr{I}_Z)=(-1)^k (k-1)![Z].$$

In Fulton's book Intersection Theory, Theorem 15.3 and Example 15.3.1 (p. 297 of my edition) it is proven, by using GRR, that $$c_k(\mathscr{O}_Z)=(-1)^{k-1}(k-1)![Z].$$ By the short exact sequence $$0 \to \mathscr{I}_Z \to \mathscr{O}_X \to \mathscr{O}_Z \to 0$$ one has $1=c(\mathscr{O}_X)=c(\mathscr{O}_Z)c(\mathscr{I}_Z)$ and this implies $$c_k(\mathscr{I}_Z)=(-1)^k (k-1)![Z].$$

added 14 characters in body
Source Link
Francesco Polizzi
  • 66.3k
  • 5
  • 180
  • 283

In Fulton's book "Intersection Theory", Theorem 15.3 and Example 15.3.1 (p. 297 of my edition) it is proven, by using GRR, that $$c_k(\mathscr{O}_Z)=(-1)^{k-1}(k-1)![Z].$$ By the short exact sequence $$0 \to \mathscr{I}_Z \to \mathscr{O}_X \to \mathscr{O}_Z \to 0$$ one has $1=c(\mathscr{O}_X)=c(\mathscr{O}_Z)c(\mathscr{I}_Z)$ and this implies $$c_k(\mathscr{I}_Z)=(-1)^k (k-1)![Z].$$

In Fulton's book "Intersection Theory", Theorem 15.3 and Example 15.3.1 (p. 297) it is proven, by using GRR, that $$c_k(\mathscr{O}_Z)=(-1)^{k-1}(k-1)![Z].$$ By the short exact sequence $$0 \to \mathscr{I}_Z \to \mathscr{O}_X \to \mathscr{O}_Z \to 0$$ one has $1=c(\mathscr{O}_X)=c(\mathscr{O}_Z)c(\mathscr{I}_Z)$ and this implies $$c_k(\mathscr{I}_Z)=(-1)^k (k-1)![Z].$$

In Fulton's book "Intersection Theory", Theorem 15.3 and Example 15.3.1 (p. 297 of my edition) it is proven, by using GRR, that $$c_k(\mathscr{O}_Z)=(-1)^{k-1}(k-1)![Z].$$ By the short exact sequence $$0 \to \mathscr{I}_Z \to \mathscr{O}_X \to \mathscr{O}_Z \to 0$$ one has $1=c(\mathscr{O}_X)=c(\mathscr{O}_Z)c(\mathscr{I}_Z)$ and this implies $$c_k(\mathscr{I}_Z)=(-1)^k (k-1)![Z].$$

Source Link
Francesco Polizzi
  • 66.3k
  • 5
  • 180
  • 283
Loading