Skip to main content
2 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 30, 2012 at 6:43 comment added agt Initially I tried to justify the statement in Sternberg-Guillemin along the lines of Sebastian's answer. But it wasn't conclusive. Then I devised the very elementary counter-example in the Edit after which in general $\tau$ is not even continuous. So, under what hypothesis Guillemin and Sternberg state (between pages 170-171) that $\mathrm{per}_H$ is submanifold of $\mathbb R\times M$? I have thought to the presence on $M$ of a principal $S^1$-bundle structure whose fibers are the orbits of $X.$ But it seems to strong.
Aug 29, 2012 at 19:48 history answered Alejandro CC BY-SA 3.0