Timeline for Simplicial and cubical decompositions of low valence
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2010 at 15:15 | history | edited | Kevin Walker | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 15 characters in body
|
| Jan 3, 2010 at 15:12 | comment | added | Kevin Walker | Yes, bad choice of terminology on my part. I'll edit my answer to fix it. | |
| Jan 3, 2010 at 13:59 | comment | added | Dmitri Panov | Kevin thanks for this explantion! Just a nitpick, a cone points with angles 5/2 pi and 3/2 pi should not be called orbifold points, orbifold points are points with angle 2pi/n. Also 5/4 2^n looks quite optimistic for me... But it is surelly worth to think about generalisation of their construction for high dim. | |
| Jan 3, 2010 at 2:48 | history | answered | Kevin Walker | CC BY-SA 2.5 |