Timeline for How to check numerical precision of my computation of Stieltjes-constants?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2012 at 22:59 | comment | added | Gottfried Helms | @Fredrik: I've re-computed the 1000-digit version with prec 1600 and uploaded to the given link; the last entry matches now exactly your reference where the last digit is rounded upwards (you have 3 digits more). So I seem to have at least a rough estimate for the lower bound of computational requirements... | |
| Aug 26, 2012 at 22:28 | comment | added | Gottfried Helms | @Fredrik: I added some heuristic for the achievable precision to my original question. | |
| Aug 26, 2012 at 20:49 | comment | added | Gottfried Helms | @Fredrik: Well, very nice, indeed! That made it immediately into my bookmarks; thank you very much! I'll see what I can take from it... | |
| Aug 26, 2012 at 17:39 | comment | added | Fredrik Johansson | The algorithm is described here: mpmath.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/doc/build/functions/… Specifically, it does numerical integration. | |
| Aug 26, 2012 at 17:14 | comment | added | Gottfried Helms | Ah, thanks; I'll see whether I can find something about the implementation in mpmath. | |
| Aug 26, 2012 at 15:46 | history | answered | Fredrik Johansson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |