This is not a precise answer, mainly some thoughts.
Historically both ideas seem very old (2000+ years), and sometimes it is hard to tell what point of view is predominant.
Say if one looks at the Method of Exhaustion or things around Zeno's paradoxes, what does arise, 'sequences' or 'series'? For some of the constructions, the one seems more natural, for others the other. In any case, in some form of series already arose then.
One more point in favor of the fact that series wherewere around early on: while in today's courses differentiation comes before integerationintegration, in an intuitive sense I think integration is rather the easier or more natural idea, and historically early forms of integerationintegration are very old (cf. Method of Exhaustion, which in my opinion counts as some sort of integerationintegration). And integration and series sort of go together.
For your second question, for a course today, I would however start with sequence.
If one wants to talk about series in a somewhat rigorous form just having the notion/word sequence at ones disposal already seems like a big plus.