Timeline for Why is it so cool to square numbers (in terms of finding the standard deviation)?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2023 at 15:48 | comment | added | LSpice | @isomorphismes, re, it is self-dual. | |
| Mar 6, 2023 at 15:48 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Typos, while this is on the front page
|
| Aug 10, 2021 at 7:30 | comment | added | KingLogic | @CapKhoury easier math and more advanced math? | |
| S Jul 9, 2015 at 7:42 | history | suggested | Mateen Ulhaq | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Converted to LaTeX
|
| Jul 9, 2015 at 7:31 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 9, 2015 at 7:42 | |||||
| Mar 22, 2015 at 11:02 | comment | added | Rasmus | The longer answer is shorter than the short answer. :) | |
| Jan 14, 2014 at 17:55 | comment | added | Stephan Sturm | @isomorphismes It has more random variables with finite norm. And it implies that two random variables with finite variance have also a finite covariance. | |
| Jan 14, 2014 at 16:17 | comment | added | isomorphismes | But why is $L^2$ cooler than $L^4$ or some other absolute value/function space? | |
| Jul 30, 2010 at 1:26 | comment | added | Cap Khoury | What definitions are you using for "short" and "long"? | |
| Oct 24, 2009 at 20:31 | comment | added | Ilya Nikokoshev |
Sorry, I think I was too rush in downvoting. The L^2 observation makes a lot of sense and is quite deep.
|
|
| Oct 18, 2009 at 17:17 | history | answered | Mark4483 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |