Skip to main content
Typos, while this is on the front page
Source Link
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69

Short answer: You could argue that the most natural thing to do when defining a "standard deviation-type" quantity is to use an absolute value: $E(|X|)$, but itsit's really annoying to deal with absolute values under the expectation, so we use the next best thing: $\sqrt{E( X^2 )}$. You still get something positive and itsit's easier to deal with the square inside. We take a square root at the end to get something with the same "units" as $X$.

Long answer: It's often helpful to think of random variables as living in the function space $L^2(\Omega)$, and in this setting, this computation gives the $L^2$ norm of the centered random variable $X - EX$. Also, with this perspective, the covariance defines is aan inner product.

Short answer: You could argue that the most natural thing to do when defining a "standard deviation-type" quantity is to use an absolute value: $E(|X|)$, but its really annoying to deal with absolute values under the expectation, so we use the next best thing: $\sqrt{E( X^2 )}$. You still get something positive and its easier to deal with the square inside. We take a square root at the end to get something with the same "units" as $X$.

Long answer: It's often helpful to think of random variables as living in the function space $L^2(\Omega)$, and in this setting, this computation gives the $L^2$ norm of the centered random variable $X - EX$. Also, with this perspective, the covariance defines is a inner product.

Short answer: You could argue that the most natural thing to do when defining a "standard deviation-type" quantity is to use an absolute value: $E(|X|)$, but it's really annoying to deal with absolute values under the expectation, so we use the next best thing: $\sqrt{E( X^2 )}$. You still get something positive and it's easier to deal with the square inside. We take a square root at the end to get something with the same "units" as $X$.

Long answer: It's often helpful to think of random variables as living in the function space $L^2(\Omega)$, and in this setting, this computation gives the $L^2$ norm of the centered random variable $X - EX$. Also, with this perspective, the covariance defines an inner product.

Short answer: You could argue that the most natural thing to do when defining a "standard deviation-type" quantity is to use an absolute value: E( |X| ) $E(|X|)$, but its really annoying to deal with absolute values under the expectation, so we use the next best thing: E( X^2 )^(1/2) $\sqrt{E( X^2 )}$. You still get something positive and its easier to deal with the square inside. We take a square root at the end to get something with the same "units" as X$X$.

Long answer: It's often helpful to think of random variables as living in the function space L^2(Omega)$L^2(\Omega)$, and in this setting, this computation gives the L^2$L^2$ norm of the centered random variable X - EX$X - EX$. Also, with this perspective, the covariance defines is a inner product.

Short answer: You could argue that the most natural thing to do when defining a "standard deviation-type" quantity is to use an absolute value: E( |X| ), but its really annoying to deal with absolute values under the expectation, so we use the next best thing: E( X^2 )^(1/2). You still get something positive and its easier to deal with the square inside. We take a square root at the end to get something with the same "units" as X.

Long answer: It's often helpful to think of random variables as living in the function space L^2(Omega), and in this setting, this computation gives the L^2 norm of the centered random variable X - EX. Also, with this perspective, the covariance defines is a inner product.

Short answer: You could argue that the most natural thing to do when defining a "standard deviation-type" quantity is to use an absolute value: $E(|X|)$, but its really annoying to deal with absolute values under the expectation, so we use the next best thing: $\sqrt{E( X^2 )}$. You still get something positive and its easier to deal with the square inside. We take a square root at the end to get something with the same "units" as $X$.

Long answer: It's often helpful to think of random variables as living in the function space $L^2(\Omega)$, and in this setting, this computation gives the $L^2$ norm of the centered random variable $X - EX$. Also, with this perspective, the covariance defines is a inner product.

Source Link
Mark4483
  • 249
  • 1
  • 2

Short answer: You could argue that the most natural thing to do when defining a "standard deviation-type" quantity is to use an absolute value: E( |X| ), but its really annoying to deal with absolute values under the expectation, so we use the next best thing: E( X^2 )^(1/2). You still get something positive and its easier to deal with the square inside. We take a square root at the end to get something with the same "units" as X.

Long answer: It's often helpful to think of random variables as living in the function space L^2(Omega), and in this setting, this computation gives the L^2 norm of the centered random variable X - EX. Also, with this perspective, the covariance defines is a inner product.