Timeline for Abstract number ring of any characteristic
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2012 at 22:53 | comment | added | user9072 | Just regarding the point 'abstract number ring' this merely means that the quotient by any ideal is finite (and some nondegeneracy condition, not a field and infinite). Pete Clark seems to lieke them math.uga.edu/~pete/aant.pdf | |
| Aug 15, 2012 at 21:57 | comment | added | user16974 | @lemniscate: I got the point, which answers my question in the negative. | |
| Aug 15, 2012 at 21:39 | comment | added | Alexander Gruber | Is it true that the $I_k$ must be necessarily be all of the distinct ideals of $D$? If so the $n_k$ would have to have appropriate multiplicities for the $\mathbb{Z}_p[x]$ example. | |
| Aug 15, 2012 at 21:37 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Aug 15, 2012 at 21:21 | history | answered | Andreas Blass | CC BY-SA 3.0 |