Timeline for Need M combinatorial for existence of injective model structure on $M^G$?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2019 at 11:49 | history | edited | David White | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fixed typo because it was on the front page anyway
|
| Feb 13, 2019 at 4:25 | history | edited | Mike Shulman | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Add recent references
|
| Jun 17, 2015 at 17:04 | comment | added | Mike Shulman | @FernandoMuro, of course, but what I meant was an injective model structure for a general diagram shape. | |
| Jun 16, 2015 at 9:25 | comment | added | Fernando Muro | Mike, concerning your last paragraph, you probably have seen these: Reedy model structures on diagrams indexed by an inverse category. | |
| Aug 8, 2014 at 7:29 | vote | accept | David White | ||
| Jun 9, 2015 at 8:46 | |||||
| Apr 12, 2013 at 15:51 | comment | added | Zhen Lin | @Mike At first I thought "logical approach" meant "straightforward", but having skimmed the paper now, I see you mean "logical" in the literal sense! A very remarkable paper. | |
| Aug 16, 2012 at 0:02 | comment | added | David White | Hi. Thanks for the answer and references. I'll have to look into them. I'm voting you up, but not accepting the answer yet as I still hope others come along and give more references or ideas about avoiding this A.3.3.3 argument. My hope was that early references wouldn't have that. I suppose I'll find out soon when I read the ones you mention. | |
| Aug 15, 2012 at 20:45 | history | answered | Mike Shulman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |