Timeline for Equivalent definitions of invertible modules
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2022 at 6:12 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak |
added the (modules) tag
|
|
| S Apr 4, 2022 at 5:54 | history | suggested | Brent Baccala | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
updated link
|
| Apr 4, 2022 at 1:54 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 4, 2022 at 5:54 | |||||
| Nov 12, 2015 at 21:55 | answer | added | Qiaochu Yuan | timeline score: 9 | |
| S Nov 12, 2015 at 21:28 | history | suggested | Viktor Vaughn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed LaTeX
|
| Nov 12, 2015 at 21:09 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 12, 2015 at 21:28 | |||||
| Aug 16, 2013 at 3:04 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 16, 2013 at 9:35 | |||||
| Aug 8, 2013 at 13:47 | comment | added | David White | This question appears to be off-topic because it is not a question. The comments have already accomplished what the OP wanted | |
| Aug 8, 2013 at 13:33 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 8, 2013 at 16:31 | |||||
| Aug 8, 2013 at 13:16 | comment | added | Martin Brandenburg | Duplicate of Justification of the term "invertible sheaf" | |
| Jan 22, 2013 at 21:13 | answer | added | Bombyx mori | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 12, 2012 at 18:03 | vote | accept | eb80 | ||
| Aug 11, 2012 at 17:46 | answer | added | Pete L. Clark | timeline score: 12 | |
| Aug 9, 2012 at 22:30 | comment | added | Fernando Muro | This is very similar to the proof that any TQFT must take finite-dimensional values. Finite generation is built in the tensor product. | |
| Aug 9, 2012 at 14:09 | comment | added | Damian Rössler | Also looks correct to me | |
| Aug 9, 2012 at 13:08 | comment | added | Steven Landsburg | Your proof looks correct. | |
| Aug 9, 2012 at 12:55 | history | asked | eb80 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |