Skip to main content

Timeline for A remark by Gromov on 4-manifolds

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

5 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 5, 2012 at 22:43 comment added Bruno Martelli aha, he says "possibly with fixed points!", I presumed $\Gamma$ was acting freely, a stupid mistake. Thanks
Aug 5, 2012 at 22:35 comment added Anton Petrunin @Bruno, check "On universal groups and three-manifolds" by Hilden--Lozano--Montesinos--Whitten
Aug 5, 2012 at 22:17 comment added Bruno Martelli I don't understand that paragraph. He says that every 3-manifold is a quotient $S/\Gamma$ of a symmetric space by a discrete group of isometries $\Gamma$ quoting Thurston, but this fact is not true for all 3-manifolds (you need to remove essential spheres and tori), and one should quote Perelman instead of Thurston anyway. Then he says that in dimension $n\geqslant 4$ it is not known whether every manifold is homeomorphic to such a quotient $S/\Gamma$, but that looks not reasonable to me. What am I missing?
Aug 5, 2012 at 22:03 answer added Ian Agol timeline score: 10
Aug 5, 2012 at 21:29 history asked Thomas Riepe CC BY-SA 3.0