Timeline for Does there exist a wide but not full abelian subcategory of an abelian category?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2012 at 19:37 | vote | accept | Mohamed Barakat | ||
| Aug 5, 2012 at 14:27 | answer | added | Florian Eisele | timeline score: 13 | |
| Aug 4, 2012 at 17:35 | comment | added | Simone Virili | By wide subcategory one usually means a subcategory which contains all the objects of the original category (but not necessarily all the morphisms, as in this question). A better notion is that of essentially wide which just means that the inclusion functor is essentially surjective on objects (the subcategory contains at least one object for each isomorphism class). | |
| Aug 4, 2012 at 15:37 | comment | added | André Henriques | Your question would gain in clarity if you explained the meaning of "wide". | |
| Aug 3, 2012 at 14:51 | history | asked | Mohamed Barakat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |