Skip to main content

Timeline for Lattice-cube minimal blocking sets

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 11, 2017 at 12:08 history edited Joseph O'Rourke CC BY-SA 3.0
Image links broken; now fixed.
Aug 3, 2012 at 1:48 comment added Joseph O'Rourke @ARupinski: Very nice question! Yes, the reason I (mistakenly) thought maybe my example was minimal is that it was irreducible.
Aug 3, 2012 at 0:48 comment added ARupinski I was thinking about this question some more today, and I realized that your initial 10-point blocking set in $C_3(3)$ is still interesting for the following reason: it is 'irreducible' in the sense that removing any point leaves a non-blocking set. So you might also ask what the size of the largest irreducible blocking set is for $C_d(n)$; to me at least it appears much harder to obtain sharp bounds in this latter case. For $d = n = 3$ it seems to be 13 (obtained by taking the central point of each edge as well as the center of the cube), although I haven't rigorously proved this.
Aug 1, 2012 at 23:26 answer added ARupinski timeline score: 2
Aug 1, 2012 at 22:46 vote accept Joseph O'Rourke
Aug 1, 2012 at 22:46 history edited Joseph O'Rourke CC BY-SA 3.0
Addendum and answer.
Aug 1, 2012 at 20:38 answer added Eoin timeline score: 5
Aug 1, 2012 at 20:15 comment added Johan Wästlund If I got this right, the set of points whose coordinates add to a number divisible by $n$ will have exactly one point on each such line. Does this answer the question?
Aug 1, 2012 at 19:39 comment added Joseph O'Rourke @Seva: You are right!---Thanks; corrected.
Aug 1, 2012 at 19:39 history edited Joseph O'Rourke CC BY-SA 3.0
edited body; added 12 characters in body
Aug 1, 2012 at 19:36 comment added Seva It is my understanding that the first line contains a typo ($d$ in $\{1,2,...,d\}$ is to be replaced with $n$).
Aug 1, 2012 at 18:57 history asked Joseph O'Rourke CC BY-SA 3.0