Timeline for Finite measure on the power set
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2013 at 16:45 | history | edited | Goldstern | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
set-theory tag
|
| Nov 2, 2013 at 13:31 | answer | added | Martin Hairer | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jul 31, 2012 at 9:15 | comment | added | Philip Brooker | @Trevor Wilson: ah, yes, of course. That makes the problem much more interesting! Thanks. | |
| Jul 31, 2012 at 8:37 | vote | accept | Xander Faber | ||
| Jul 31, 2012 at 6:49 | history | edited | Xander Faber | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added an implicit hypothesis
|
| Jul 31, 2012 at 6:07 | answer | added | Andrés E. Caicedo | timeline score: 14 | |
| Jul 31, 2012 at 6:03 | comment | added | Trevor Wilson | @Philip: a measure on a $\sigma$-algebra is usually required to be countably additive, not just finitely additive. | |
| Jul 31, 2012 at 5:55 | comment | added | Philip Brooker | Maybe I'm missing something, but couldn't you just take a free ultrafilter on $X$ and let the measure of $S\subseteq X$ equal $1$ is $S$ belongs to the ultrafilter, and $0$ otherwise? | |
| Jul 31, 2012 at 5:29 | history | asked | Xander Faber | CC BY-SA 3.0 |