Timeline for Riemann hypothesis for zeta function of definable sets over finite fields
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 30, 2012 at 1:31 | history | edited | user16974 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 92 characters in body
|
Jul 29, 2012 at 22:19 | comment | added | Andreas Blass | It seems to me that $Z_X(t)$ is not well-defined. A single set $X\subseteq F^n$ could have several equivalent definitions over $F$ that become inequivalent over extension fields. So "the formula defining $X$" is ambiguous. | |
Jul 29, 2012 at 21:23 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
Jul 29, 2012 at 21:20 | answer | added | Will Sawin | timeline score: 5 | |
Jul 29, 2012 at 20:54 | history | edited | user16974 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
Jul 29, 2012 at 20:32 | history | asked | user16974 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |