Timeline for Question on Ball Quotients
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 30, 2012 at 21:49 | history | edited | kla | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 61 characters in body; edited tags
|
Jul 30, 2012 at 6:57 | vote | accept | kla | ||
Jul 29, 2012 at 21:14 | comment | added | kla | @inkspot Thanks. Very good point! No, I assume the torus $T$ is a symplectic submanifold of $X$. | |
Jul 29, 2012 at 19:47 | comment | added | inkspot | Do you mean "complex torus, embedded holomorphically"? Then no, from looking at the universal covers: every holomorphic map from $\mathbb C$ to a complex ball is constant. | |
Jul 29, 2012 at 16:55 | comment | added | Peter Dalakov | In a different vein, when people study the birational classification of <i>non-compact</i> ball quotients, they often use "toroidal compactifications", i.e. compactify $B/\Gamma$ by adjoining elliptic curves. | |
Jul 29, 2012 at 15:48 | answer | added | Misha | timeline score: 7 | |
Jul 29, 2012 at 15:19 | history | edited | kla | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
Jul 29, 2012 at 14:08 | comment | added | kla | Yes, I assume $X$ is compact. The torus $T$ is a submanifold of $X$, and I consider the subgroup of $\pi_{1}(X)$ generated by the loops on $T$. | |
Jul 29, 2012 at 14:05 | history | edited | kla | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 37 characters in body
|
Jul 29, 2012 at 13:04 | history | edited | kla | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 5 characters in body; edited tags; edited tags
|
Jul 29, 2012 at 12:10 | history | asked | kla | CC BY-SA 3.0 |