Timeline for Does every embedding of one unipotent group (over R) in another extend to an embedding of the respective upper triangular matrix groups?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2012 at 12:44 | comment | added | Florian Eisele | No, I suppose "m=n=1" was not standard notation. Changed it to "m=n=2". | |
| Jul 24, 2012 at 12:42 | history | edited | Florian Eisele | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed notation
|
| Jul 24, 2012 at 12:36 | comment | added | shane.orourke | Nice answer, thank you very much. And you're probably right to doubt that abstract group embeddings are the appropriate level of generality to consider: I'll have to think about this and possibly edit the question later. BTW: is the notation $m=n=1$ (rather than 2) above standard? | |
| Jul 24, 2012 at 2:25 | history | answered | Florian Eisele | CC BY-SA 3.0 |