Timeline for Help me understand boundary terms in actions over nontrivial manifolds
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2010 at 22:41 | history | edited | mathphysicist | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
typo fixed: closed --> exact
|
| Jan 1, 2010 at 7:06 | comment | added | Domenic | Thank you, this was extremely helpful. Given that $T$ is the contortion tensor, it makes sense that the given contraction vanishes, since it is antisymmetric in the two indices you are contracting over. (This is just a restatement of what you said using more vocabulary, basically :P.) | |
| Jan 1, 2010 at 7:03 | vote | accept | Domenic | ||
| Dec 31, 2009 at 18:52 | history | edited | mathphysicist | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
typo fixed
|
| Dec 31, 2009 at 17:56 | history | edited | mathphysicist | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
typo fixed
|
| Dec 31, 2009 at 17:43 | history | edited | mathphysicist | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
last sentence added
|
| Dec 31, 2009 at 14:34 | history | answered | mathphysicist | CC BY-SA 2.5 |