Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 25, 2012 at 21:00 history edited Jim Conant CC BY-SA 3.0
added 989 characters in body
Jul 20, 2012 at 13:43 comment added Jim Conant @Kevin: that's a good idea.
Jul 20, 2012 at 13:42 comment added Jim Conant @Jeremy: could you elaborate?
Jul 20, 2012 at 11:18 comment added Jeremy Teitelbaum This looks like a version of modular symbols to me.
Jul 20, 2012 at 9:25 comment added Kevin Buzzard I'd be tempted to try and write down an isomorphism between your two spaces (and not think about modular forms at all). You've computed dimensions for $n$ small -- but why not compute some explicit bases, and try and spot an isomorphism. If you've already done this, then why not post the polynomials which span the six 1-dimensional spaces in both cases and see if anyone else can spot a link? Perhaps a basis for the first 2-dimensional space in each case might also help. I'm not saying this will definitely work, but it's perhaps worth a try.
Jul 20, 2012 at 2:38 comment added Jim Conant I'm putting by bet on modular forms and not the A024160 sequence, but it's good to be aware of alternatives!
Jul 20, 2012 at 2:22 comment added Frank Thorne @Barry: In the case of dimensions of spaces of cusp forms you have d(n + 12) = d(n) + 1, which is not true of the sequence you linked to. Indeed, this sequence is very simple: the space of modular forms for SL_2(\mathbb{Z}) is generated by Eisenstein series of weights 4 and 6, so the dimension of modular forms for weight n is the number of ways to write n=4a + 6b with a and b nonnegative integers. To get the dimension of the space of cusp forms, subtract 1.
Jul 20, 2012 at 0:42 comment added Barry Cipra You may have already seen (and dismissed) this, but your sequence 0,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,1,1,2,1,2 shows up as part of oeis.org/A024160
Jul 20, 2012 at 0:17 history asked Jim Conant CC BY-SA 3.0