Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 23, 2014 at 8:28 answer added Dan Petersen timeline score: 2
Oct 12, 2013 at 12:33 history edited Tom CC BY-SA 3.0
corrected spelling of Tsushima
Jul 27, 2013 at 14:16 comment added Tom Just sent you a mail ! It's great that I get to know people by this question.
Jul 27, 2013 at 13:32 comment added Dan Petersen Oh -- you're right! I was thinking of the fact that Conjecture 6.3 in B-F-VdG is open both for local systems of the form $\mathbb V_{a,0}$ and $\mathbb V_{a,a}$; the former correspond to SMFs with $k=3$ and the latter to ones with $j=0$. It is this conjecture I think I can prove for the ones of the form $\mathbb V_{a,0}$. But of course it's already known that Tsushima's formula holds for scalar valued SMFs. Anyway this is work in progress and there are still things to check, so if you are interested you can send me an e-mail.
Jul 27, 2013 at 11:15 comment added Tom I'm puzzled now if you can give an ad hoc proof of the case $k=3, j\geq 0$ then you have proven the whole conjecture in a glimpse, haven't you ?
Jul 27, 2013 at 10:55 comment added Dan Petersen Tsushima's dimension is conjectured to hold for any $k \geq 3$, $j \geq 0$. There is strong evidence for this conjecture coming from point counts of moduli spaces over finite fields, see Section 6 of Bergström, Faber, Van der Geer: Siegel modular forms of degree three adn the cohomology of local systems. If you are interested I think I might be able to give an ad hoc proof of the case $k=3$, $j \geq 0$.
Jul 27, 2013 at 10:12 vote accept Tom
Jul 27, 2013 at 10:11 history edited Tom CC BY-SA 3.0
added the articles by Ibukiyama, Satoh and van Dorp and highlighted Tshushima's article
Jul 19, 2012 at 2:48 answer added ncr timeline score: 4
Jul 18, 2012 at 20:11 history asked Tom CC BY-SA 3.0