Timeline for A different criterion for equivalence of codes?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2012 at 15:41 | comment | added | Jyrki Lahtonen | Sorry about being a bit cranky here. I cannot get rid of my preconceived notion of the "correct" version of this question, and only the third (or chronologically the first) example is a good match with that. | |
| Jul 19, 2012 at 14:52 | history | edited | Dilip Sarwate | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected typos
|
| Jul 19, 2012 at 8:10 | comment | added | Jyrki Lahtonen | Hmm. I rather like the third example only. While it may fit the scope of the question, going for a coset feels like cheating. As does a code with one component always zero. | |
| Jul 19, 2012 at 1:23 | history | edited | Dilip Sarwate | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 416 characters in body
|
| Jul 18, 2012 at 23:17 | history | edited | Dilip Sarwate | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 305 characters in body
|
| Jul 18, 2012 at 22:52 | comment | added | Gerhard Paseman | Welcome to MathOverflow! Gerhard "Ask Me About System Design" Paseman, 2012.07.18 | |
| Jul 18, 2012 at 21:38 | history | edited | Dilip Sarwate | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added note in response to OP''s request for simpler example.
|
| Jul 18, 2012 at 6:55 | comment | added | Jyrki Lahtonen | That's a nice one (+1). I was half expecting something longer. | |
| Jul 17, 2012 at 19:14 | history | answered | Dilip Sarwate | CC BY-SA 3.0 |