Timeline for Model category structure on Set without axiom of choice
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 16, 2012 at 1:14 | history | edited | David White | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Texified
|
Jan 1, 2010 at 13:22 | answer | added | D.-C. Cisinski | timeline score: 2 | |
Dec 31, 2009 at 23:06 | vote | accept | Reid Barton | ||
Dec 31, 2009 at 23:05 | comment | added | Reid Barton | Yes, these are the two model category structures in which the cofibrations are the monomorphisms (at least under AC). I gave a rather ad-hoc description of the category I wanted to consider, but it falls into a family of more interesting ones: presheaves on the category of nonempty totally ordered sets of cardinality <= n+1 form a model category whose objects we can identify with the n-coskeletal simplicial sets, and whose homotopy category is that of (n-1)-types. (This works for -1 <= n <= infinity.) | |
Dec 31, 2009 at 19:02 | comment | added | Mike Shulman | Is there a reason you want to treat empty sets specially? I think there's a simpler model structure in which the cofibrations are the injections, the fibrations are the surjections (or split surjections, if we don't assume choice), and everything is a weak equivalence. (I.e. it is just a single weak factorization system.) | |
Dec 31, 2009 at 18:51 | answer | added | Mike Shulman | timeline score: 7 | |
Dec 31, 2009 at 18:02 | answer | added | Reid Barton | timeline score: 2 | |
Dec 31, 2009 at 16:37 | history | edited | Reid Barton | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 3022 characters in body
|
Dec 31, 2009 at 7:27 | history | edited | Reid Barton | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 347 characters in body
|
Dec 31, 2009 at 7:07 | history | asked | Reid Barton | CC BY-SA 2.5 |