Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 17, 2012 at 16:51 comment added Chris Gerig We were just clarifying that regardless of the E- or B-field, the magnetic moment will interact (or the charge will interact, depending on which particle we're considering). "Reference frame" in that sense wasn't meaning move at a speed (which is what I originally thought when he made the comment, and then said 'sorry' after).
Jul 17, 2012 at 9:49 comment added Dmitri Pavlov @Chris: How can this be reconciled with Konrad's claim (to which you apparently agreed) that being electrically charged or having a magnetic moment depends on the reference frame?
Jul 17, 2012 at 4:43 history edited Chris Gerig CC BY-SA 3.0
added 473 characters in body
Jul 17, 2012 at 3:55 history edited Chris Gerig CC BY-SA 3.0
added 777 characters in body
Jul 17, 2012 at 0:59 comment added Chris Gerig No, because the particle will never gain a charge...
Jul 16, 2012 at 23:53 comment added Dmitri Pavlov But it's still merely a choice of the reference frame, isn't it? Won't an observer moving at relativistic speeds observe AB effect as AC and vice versa?
Jul 16, 2012 at 21:53 comment added Chris Gerig No, the math is the same, the physics is different. The topological phase comes about due to the vector potential A mathematically, but this achieved in two different ways... One via an electric charge, one via a magnetic moment.
Jul 16, 2012 at 13:52 comment added Dmitri Pavlov I wonder why physicists would make such a big deal out of it (and write several papers about it) if it is merely a change in the coordinate system. In particular, I don't understand why a mere change in the coordinate system would require an independent experimental confirmation, as claimed in this article, for example: atomwave.org/rmparticle/ao%20refs/…
Jul 15, 2012 at 22:55 history answered Chris Gerig CC BY-SA 3.0