Timeline for Important results that use infinite-dimensional manifolds?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 13, 2016 at 14:38 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Todd Trimble | ||
Jan 27, 2010 at 23:12 | comment | added | Ryan Budney | Fadell and Neuwirth's argument was a finite-dimensional one but it was inspired by Palais's result that if $N$ is a submanifold of $M$ then the restriction map $Emb(M, X) \to Emb(N, X)$ is a locally trivial fibre bundle, where $Emb(M,X)$ denotes the space of smooth embeddings of $M$ in $X$. The Fadell-Neuwirth argument is for the special situation where $M$ and $N$ are finite sets. | |
Jan 27, 2010 at 22:59 | comment | added | algori | Ryan -- where does the proof of the fact that pure braid groups are iterated semi-direct products of free groups use infinite-dimensional manifolds? This follows simply from the fact that the ordered configuration space $F(\mathbf{R}^2,k)$ of $k$ distinct points in the plane is fibered over $F(\mathbf{R}^2,k-1)$ with fiber homotopy equivalent to the wedge of $k-1$ circles. | |
Jan 4, 2010 at 17:38 | comment | added | Mark Meckes | Your summary can be paraphrased to answer the more basic question of why infinite dimensional vector spaces are important: even if your primary interest is in things happening in finite dimensional spaces (e.g. PDEs), then infinite dimensional spaces of functions come up naturally. | |
Jan 1, 2010 at 20:03 | history | edited | Ryan Budney | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
more examples
|
Dec 31, 2009 at 1:47 | history | edited | Ryan Budney | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
elaboration
|
Dec 31, 2009 at 1:42 | history | answered | Ryan Budney | CC BY-SA 2.5 |