Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 12, 2017 at 17:14 comment added YangMills @RobertBryant Thank you very much, I was not aware of this!
Aug 12, 2017 at 12:34 comment added Robert Bryant @YangMills: As for the error(s) in Adler's 1969 paper, the main breakdown occurs because his whole argument relies on Proposition 2 from his earlier paper The Second Fundamental Form of a Kähler Metric, Amer. J. Math. 89 (1967), 260–274, and this Proposition is simply wrong. His error is that he assumes that the first Chern form of the LC-connection of an Hermitian metric on a complex manifold is necessarily of type $(1,1)$. (He just writes that it's "a known property", with no argument.) This false claim is crucial for his construction of a Kähler metric when his inequality is satisfied.
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Aug 7, 2013 at 23:34 answer added Guan timeline score: 3
S Sep 1, 2012 at 19:15 vote accept HeWhoHungers
Jul 12, 2012 at 0:51 answer added Robert Bryant timeline score: 48
Jul 11, 2012 at 6:45 vote accept HeWhoHungers
S Sep 1, 2012 at 19:15
Jul 11, 2012 at 3:22 comment added Deane Yang YangMills, that might be right. Thanks!
Jul 11, 2012 at 2:57 comment added YangMills @Deane: maybe you were thinking about S.S.Chern's last preprint (2004)? It was never published, but you might have seen it.
Jul 11, 2012 at 2:49 answer added YangMills timeline score: 14
Jul 11, 2012 at 2:45 comment added Deane Yang I vaguely recall knowing about 3 separate published proofs that were not taken seriously by other experts but I don't remember the third one anymore. I've never found anyone who could explain to me what the error in either Adler's or Hsiung's proof is. But I never thought of asking Siu.
Jul 10, 2012 at 22:08 comment added YangMills Having said this, I don't know exactly where Hsiung's mistake is, I will search a bit and see what I can find.
Jul 10, 2012 at 22:07 comment added YangMills You might ask the same question about the paper of A.Adler "The second fundamental forms of $S^{6}$ and $P^{n}({\bf C})$", Amer. J. Math. 91 (1969) 657–670, which claims to prove the same result. In this case Steve Krantz says here books.google.com/… that he saw a paper of Y.T.Siu which explains precisely where Adler's error is. However, I couldn't find any paper of Siu where this is discussed.
Jul 10, 2012 at 20:30 history asked HeWhoHungers CC BY-SA 3.0