Timeline for What is the "ray" in ray class group?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2012 at 3:38 | history | edited | Chandan Singh Dalawat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Feuter --> Fueter
|
| Jul 9, 2012 at 15:08 | comment | added | Emerton | Dear Chandan, You have a typo: "Feuter" --> "Fueter". Best wishes, Matthew | |
| Jul 9, 2012 at 10:09 | history | edited | Chandan Singh Dalawat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 38 characters in body
|
| Jul 9, 2012 at 9:57 | comment | added | Chandan Singh Dalawat | If you thought so Franz, it must be correct. I mentioned Weber only because the concept goes back to him. | |
| Jul 9, 2012 at 9:38 | comment | added | Franz Lemmermeyer | I always thought that the expression Strahl was coined by Fueter in his early articles on complex multiplication. If I recall it correctly, Weber talked only about class groups of orders and ring class groups. | |
| Jul 9, 2012 at 6:01 | comment | added | David Corwin | That's helpful, but we still have the question of why the term ray (or Strahl) is used. Noah's idea seems the most convincing, but I'm still looking for evidence. | |
| Jul 9, 2012 at 3:16 | history | answered | Chandan Singh Dalawat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |