Timeline for Is the diagonal morphism a strong immersion?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 1, 2012 at 23:22 | history | bounty ended | Martin Brandenburg | ||
Jul 18, 2012 at 23:29 | comment | added | Will Sawin | I was thinking about the question and editing the still-deleted answer to organize my thoughts, so that if the thoughts turned into a correct answer I could just undelete it. Presumably this created the impression of a new answer? My thoughts at no point turned into a correct answer, though there were a couple more incorrect answers. | |
Jul 15, 2012 at 7:40 | comment | added | Martin Brandenburg | @Will: You seem to have written a new answer, why is it deleted? | |
Jul 12, 2012 at 6:00 | comment | added | Martin Brandenburg | Oh, this was really silly of me. I didn't know that I had already posted it a year ago... I will delete the other one. | |
Jul 11, 2012 at 17:19 | comment | added | Will Sawin | Why are there two versions of this question? mathoverflow.net/questions/67748/… Should the other one be closed as a duplicate? | |
Jul 11, 2012 at 14:20 | comment | added | Will Sawin | I removed the answer per your suggestion. | |
Jul 10, 2012 at 11:49 | history | bounty started | Martin Brandenburg | ||
Jul 9, 2012 at 14:57 | history | edited | Martin Brandenburg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 270 characters in body
|
Jul 9, 2012 at 8:38 | comment | added | Martin Brandenburg | Yes. If it helps, we may assume first that the base is a field. | |
Jul 8, 2012 at 0:03 | answer | added | Will Sawin | timeline score: 2 | |
Jul 7, 2012 at 22:42 | comment | added | Will Sawin | One can ask this question for an arbitrary morphism, not just an arbitrary scheme, right? | |
Jul 7, 2012 at 20:44 | history | asked | Martin Brandenburg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |