Skip to main content
34 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 11, 2013 at 13:04 review Reopen votes
Sep 11, 2013 at 13:59
Nov 7, 2012 at 18:18 vote accept Papiro
Oct 8, 2012 at 22:38 history closed Will Sawin
Todd Trimble
Douglas Zare
user2995
Tom Leinster
not a real question
Oct 8, 2012 at 22:21 answer added ex0du5 timeline score: -3
Oct 8, 2012 at 19:55 comment added Todd Trimble "One might plausibly argue..." but the argument would not be a mathematical one. Anyway, the question as modified is quite vague; I've just entered a vote to close as "not a real question", in the sense of a "real mathematical question" that can be addressed here.
Oct 8, 2012 at 18:55 answer added Gene Ward Smith timeline score: 2
Jul 11, 2012 at 10:09 history edited Papiro CC BY-SA 3.0
added 45 characters in body; edited title
Jul 7, 2012 at 6:21 history reopened Andrés E. Caicedo
Charles
Joseph O'Rourke
Charles Rezk
John Stillwell
Jul 6, 2012 at 17:17 history edited Papiro
edited tags
Jul 6, 2012 at 11:40 comment added Minhyong Kim Dear David, Of course you are right. But I think you are looking ahead to the classification of music. One might plausibly argue that the more fundamental question of what is or is not music can be understood in terms of the region $M$ of the configuration space. Once again, I realize this is likely to be very hard. One of the articles in the book amazon.com/gp/… shows a spectrogram comparing some famous symphony to an orchestra warming up. The two are essentially indistinguishable to a normal person's eye.
Jul 6, 2012 at 11:03 history edited Papiro CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1285 characters in body
Jul 6, 2012 at 4:33 comment added David Feldman @Minhyong Kim - You're can be a reasonable reduction, but I think most musicologists would object to identifying a work of music with merely its sonic trace. A piece of music is a (whole) performance, a process and a social interaction. The Mazzola book basic argues that a musical composition (regardless of who besides the composer thinks it's music) is a sheaf (over some space that at least includes your I as a factor) and a performance is a section of that sheaf. It's already interesting to work out what sort of sheaves provide an adequate model for all existing compositions.
Jul 6, 2012 at 4:20 comment added Minhyong Kim Consider a standard room $R $ of some sort and the space $R×I$, where $I$ is a time interval of length, say, one minute. Let $V$ be the space of all airwaves in $R$ over the interval $I$. There is a region $S\subset V$ consisting of sound, and a region $M\subset S$ consisting of sound that an average person considers music (this would have to be determined empirically). The question then is if we can give some reasonable mathematical characterization of $M$. Clearly difficult, but the question is well-defined.
Jul 6, 2012 at 2:45 history made wiki Post Made Community Wiki by S. Carnahan
Jul 6, 2012 at 2:31 history closed Qiaochu Yuan
user6976
Chris Godsil
Ryan Budney
Will Jagy
not a real question
Jul 6, 2012 at 1:58 history edited user9072 CC BY-SA 3.0
corrected umlauts
Jul 6, 2012 at 1:06 comment added user5117 I started a meta discussion about this question: tea.mathoverflow.net/discussion/1402/mathematics-and-music
Jul 6, 2012 at 0:40 answer added Mahdi Majidi-Zolbanin timeline score: -6
Jul 5, 2012 at 23:43 answer added Joseph O'Rourke timeline score: 10
Jul 5, 2012 at 21:06 history reopened Joel David Hamkins
David Feldman
Papiro
Andrey Rekalo
Gil Kalai
Jul 5, 2012 at 20:05 history closed Gerald Edgar
Steven Landsburg
Kevin Walker
Federico Poloni
Andy Putman
off topic
Jul 5, 2012 at 19:40 answer added Lee Mosher timeline score: 2
Jul 5, 2012 at 19:32 answer added Dick Palais timeline score: 10
Jul 5, 2012 at 19:22 comment added user2035 There are certainly attempts at connecting mathematics and music, but the question whether they actually get anywhere near making a connection is subjective and argumentative.
Jul 5, 2012 at 19:20 answer added Denis Serre timeline score: 2
Jul 5, 2012 at 18:52 answer added Margaret Friedland timeline score: 3
Jul 5, 2012 at 18:49 comment added David Feldman Here's why I don't vote to close: a pure mathematician myself, I consider all applications of mathematics as good for business. Mathematics flourishes to the extent that it becomes relevant to the largest numbers of people thinking about the greatest diversity of things. Mathematics has powerful enemies who sometimes control funding, and they will eventually seize on seeming evidence of insularity. This question seems soft, but not so the 1335-page tome I recommended as framing a direct answer to it. Interesting mathematics can start from soft questions.
Jul 5, 2012 at 18:22 answer added David Feldman timeline score: 16
Jul 5, 2012 at 18:20 answer added Sniper Clown timeline score: 5
Jul 5, 2012 at 18:11 comment added Kevin Walker The question is pretty vague and nonspecific. This defect could be corrected in various ways, many of them quite interesting, but most of them not a good fit for MO. Voting to close.
Jul 5, 2012 at 18:11 history edited Papiro CC BY-SA 3.0
added 814 characters in body; deleted 2 characters in body
Jul 5, 2012 at 18:01 comment added Yul Otani I have no idea of what it says, but there is a paper called "Towards A Categorical Approach of Transformational Music Theory" by Alexandre Popoff [arxiv.org/abs/1204.3216]. I saw this at John Baez' post plus.google.com/u/0/117663015413546257905/posts/fLByuSqNew9.
Jul 5, 2012 at 17:52 comment added Gerald Edgar That is not a mathematical question. It belongs in psychology, maybe.
Jul 5, 2012 at 17:48 history asked Papiro CC BY-SA 3.0