Timeline for Equidistribution on the unit circle of particular sequences of finite subsets
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 12, 2023 at 6:21 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak |
edited tags
|
|
S Dec 12, 2023 at 5:22 | history | suggested | The Amplitwist | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed broken link to Wikipedia
|
Dec 11, 2023 at 23:50 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Dec 12, 2023 at 5:22 | |||||
S Aug 11, 2013 at 17:23 | history | suggested | Michael Albanese | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Replaced \\# with \#.
|
Aug 11, 2013 at 17:01 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Aug 11, 2013 at 17:23 | |||||
Jul 4, 2012 at 14:51 | answer | added | Peter Humphries | timeline score: 7 | |
Jul 4, 2012 at 12:47 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | Have you checked to see if there's anything like this in the book by Kuipers and Niederreiter? | |
Jul 4, 2012 at 9:27 | comment | added | Charles Matthews | The quadratic polynomial approach sounds rather like "stationary phase" theory. For exponential sums this is supposed to register with the work of Van der Corput. | |
Jul 4, 2012 at 9:19 | comment | added | Charles Matthews | Is there a reason to think much can be done for general g? | |
Jul 4, 2012 at 8:50 | comment | added | Peter Humphries | By the Erdos-Turan inequality, this would follow if you could show that $\sum_{n = 1}^{N}{e^{2\pi i m N g(n/N)}} = o(N)$ uniformly in $m$. I'm not sure how one would go about showing this though. | |
Jul 4, 2012 at 7:44 | history | edited | Jesse Gell-Redman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
Jul 4, 2012 at 7:34 | history | asked | Jesse Gell-Redman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |