Timeline for Interpretation of universal coefficients theorem for group cohomology

10 events

when toggle format	what		by	license	comment
May 12, 2021 at 11:25	history	edited	David Roberts♦	CC BY-SA 4.0	updated references and their links
Jul 7, 2012 at 16:22	history	bounty ended	Vipul Naik
Jun 30, 2012 at 15:32	history	bounty started	Vipul Naik
Jun 30, 2012 at 15:31	history	edited	Vipul Naik	CC BY-SA 3.0	grammar fixes
Jun 29, 2012 at 3:12	comment	added	Vipul Naik		Noting here: the original version of the question had the wrong statement of the universal coefficients theorem for general n (correct for n = 2 though) -- I fixed it today morning. I had said "Ext^{n-1}(G^{ab},A)" and the correct term is "Ext^1(H_{n-1}(G;Z),A)"
Jun 29, 2012 at 3:10	history	edited	Vipul Naik	CC BY-SA 3.0	spelling correction for extension
Jun 28, 2012 at 14:34	history	edited	Vipul Naik	CC BY-SA 3.0	corrected UCT sequence
Jun 28, 2012 at 10:56	comment	added	Filippo Alberto Edoardo		Have you tried assuming that $G$ is finite cyclic, so that cohomology is $2$-periodic? The isomorphism $H^q\cong H^{q+2}$ is given by an explicit cup-product so you might deduce something...but that's only a guess.
Jun 28, 2012 at 2:55	answer	added	Chris Gerig		timeline score: 4
Jun 27, 2012 at 19:57	history	asked	Vipul Naik	CC BY-SA 3.0