Timeline for Why should I believe in the Siegel's and Hasse's rationale ?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2012 at 7:56 | vote | accept | Shanmukha_Srinivasan | ||
| Jun 28, 2012 at 14:16 | comment | added | Charles Matthews | So is everyone, however My personal view is based on my own research (actually I started with the Grothendieck–Katz p-curvature conjecture en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grothendieck-Katz_p-curvature_conjecture) which is that the local-global view encourages new research. You are reading mathematics written about 50 years ago, and asking a historians' question. Why not find your own problem? This worked for me, and Zariski-dense subgroups. Try works by Emmanuel Kowalski for a fresher approach. | |
| Jun 28, 2012 at 7:32 | comment | added | Shanmukha_Srinivasan | But Charles, your answer is indeed nice. Only thing I wanted to hear is that I am interested in listening more about the Local-global principle, and why should one believe in it ?. I am particularly interested in knowing how can a local solution lifts to a global solution ?. @CharlesMatthews | |
| Jun 27, 2012 at 17:03 | comment | added | Shanmukha_Srinivasan | I took my comment back, you can feel free to see my new lipo-suctioned edit. ;) | |
| Jun 26, 2012 at 18:39 | comment | added | Charles Matthews | I disagree with at least one of the above comments. | |
| Jun 26, 2012 at 16:31 | comment | added | Shanmukha_Srinivasan | Its good to see that you work for Wikipedia. But your site don't hold an email id of you in case if I want to contact you. | |
| Jun 26, 2012 at 11:00 | history | answered | Charles Matthews | CC BY-SA 3.0 |