Timeline for Why should I believe in the Siegel's and Hasse's rationale ?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2012 at 7:56 | vote | accept | Shanmukha_Srinivasan | ||
| Jun 27, 2012 at 16:57 | comment | added | Shanmukha_Srinivasan | After not receiving any reply from quid, I thought of opening a meta-discussion ( after hearing that there is a MO META, where we can post such issues ) on his weird behavior. Anyone are free to join there and comment. Thank you. | |
| Jun 27, 2012 at 16:40 | history | edited | Shanmukha_Srinivasan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
LIPO-SUCTIONED EDIT
|
| Jun 27, 2012 at 16:39 | comment | added | Shanmukha_Srinivasan | @S.Carnahan : Dear Carnahan, I noted your point. I try to present the lip-suctioned version of the question so that users can be comfortable in answering accordingly. | |
| Jun 27, 2012 at 2:10 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | Dear Shanmukha Srinivasan, by asking us to summarize the work of several authors, you are demanding too much of people who are working for free. Please revise your question to be more specific, e.g., following the guidelines in the MathOverflow "how to ask" page, linked at the top of this page. | |
| Jun 26, 2012 at 16:22 | comment | added | Shanmukha_Srinivasan | @quid : Oh, now it reads '6'. So 6 people believe that they have seen me earlier. But this is totally funny and weird experience. I created the account today after my friends suggestion. But I no way met you . Even your name is not real to meet you. I never know anyone by name 'quid'. I am a resident of Hyderabad. Its really funny to see that 6 people met me here . Let me know who are they, so that I can wave my hands saying them "Hello" . I will also try to invite them to have a cup of cappuccino even. | |
| Jun 26, 2012 at 15:59 | comment | added | Shanmukha_Srinivasan | @DavidRoberts : Thank you David, I never know that they are some voting flags. | |
| Jun 26, 2012 at 11:00 | answer | added | Charles Matthews | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jun 26, 2012 at 10:54 | comment | added | user4245 | That is the original paper of Siegel and hard to read. The referene I provided is more readable. Siegel's work could be translated using adele to the "Tamagawa measure one" staement. | |
| Jun 26, 2012 at 10:46 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | Depends on browser - your second sha is serifed for me and the first is sans-serif. I'm using Chrome at present. the '1' means that someone has up-voted quid's comment. This requires a certain level of reputation to do. | |
| Jun 26, 2012 at 10:34 | comment | added | Shanmukha_Srinivasan | @unknown(google) : Yes , but the reference that Peter provided is "Uber Die Analytische Theorie Der Quadratischen Formen". I didn't find that link online. So do you say Tamagawa measure can be thought as a analogue of Seigel's work ? or something else. | |
| Jun 26, 2012 at 10:29 | comment | added | Shanmukha_Srinivasan | What is the '1' that is appearing besides the post of quid ?. Is it some numbering given to some comments? | |
| Jun 26, 2012 at 10:27 | comment | added | Shanmukha_Srinivasan | @DavidRoberts : Yes, Thank you !. But the problem is that even the Unicode Sha don't get changed in its appearance even after dressing with (Dollar). Generally alphabets appear differently if we dress them using (dollar symbol) for instance 'a' and '$a$'. But Sha seems to be the same all the places. Ш and $ Ш$ are same ( Latter one is dressed with dollar ) | |
| Jun 26, 2012 at 10:20 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | Sha doesn't seem to work here, so using the unicode Ш is the best you can do. | |
| Jun 26, 2012 at 10:17 | comment | added | Shanmukha_Srinivasan | @quid : Sorry, I cant understand what you are telling . Met around here ?. | |
| Jun 26, 2012 at 10:14 | comment | added | user4245 | Siegel's result is known as "mass formula" and is a corollary of the Siegel-Weil formula relating theta integral to Siegel-Eisenstein series. Roughly specking, the theta integral is connected with rational solutions while the Eisenstein series is connected with local solutions both $p$-adic and $\infty$-adic. Weil 's book "Adeles and algebraic groups" and two Acta papers 1964/65 is classic on this subject. | |
| Jun 26, 2012 at 10:01 | comment | added | user9072 | I might be wrong, but I think we already met around here. | |
| Jun 26, 2012 at 9:38 | comment | added | Shanmukha_Srinivasan | Can anyone suggest me how to use $\Sha$ here. It doesn't turn beautifully. Generally in LaTeX we use some packages, but on the other hand I didn't get $\Sha$ working here. I just used Russian letter Sha for the mean time. All are welcome to edit my post replacing the Sha. | |
| Jun 26, 2012 at 9:36 | history | asked | Shanmukha_Srinivasan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |