Timeline for Good reduction of abelian varieties [S-T] -- Why is this ring henselian?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 25, 2012 at 20:32 | comment | added | Xarles | Will Sawin explained exactly the proof I had in mind. Thanks! | |
Jun 25, 2012 at 19:55 | comment | added | Will Sawin | The straightforward approach should work. The idea is that if $\alpha \in O_L$ is a root of an irreducible polynomial $f$, then $\bar{v}$ restricted to $K(\alpha)$ is unramified, so $\alpha$ modulo $\bar{v}$ is a simple root of $f$ modulo $\bar{v}$ and lies in the algebraic closure of the residue field of $O_k$ mod $v$, so any strictly henselian ring containing $O_K$ has an algebraically closed residue field, so $\alpha$ mod $\bar{v}$ is a simple root of $f$, and is Henselian, so that extends to a root, so it contains $\alpha$. It contains every element of $O_L$, so it contains $L$. | |
Jun 25, 2012 at 19:33 | comment | added | jmc | Thanks for your answer. I read about henselinizations and strict henselinizations. One question remains: How do you prove your claim? Probably by the same straightforward approach as above, right? (I did not try that much yet, on proving your claim, I should add.) | |
Jun 25, 2012 at 19:11 | history | answered | Xarles | CC BY-SA 3.0 |