Timeline for Not especially famous, long-open problems which anyone can understand
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2022 at 11:25 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
http -> https (the question was bumped anyway)
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Nov 11, 2015 at 3:49 | history | edited | Wadim Zudilin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
a reference to solution is added
|
| Mar 28, 2015 at 12:54 | history | edited | Benoît Kloeckner | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Arranged the LaTeX to have a one-line layout of the formula
|
| Jul 1, 2012 at 7:40 | comment | added | C.S. | @Emil: Emil, The answers were split because of an user requesting me to do so. Otherwise I would have kept it here itself. | |
| Jun 25, 2012 at 10:34 | comment | added | Emil Jeřábek | It was a good idea to split the two conjectures to two answers, but you should have done it the other way around. I venture to guess that most people, like me, originally upvoted this answer because of Sendov’s conjecture, not because of an obscure integral equality which I couldn’t explain to any high school student I now of. | |
| Jun 23, 2012 at 2:36 | history | edited | C.S. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 388 characters in body
|
| Jun 22, 2012 at 17:20 | comment | added | C.S. | @alexander: thanks for fixing the broken link. | |
| Jun 22, 2012 at 12:07 | comment | added | Alexander Chervov | cured link to Sendov's conj. Great answer ! | |
| Jun 22, 2012 at 12:06 | history | edited | Alexander Chervov | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
cured link to Sendov's conj.
|
| Jun 22, 2012 at 8:55 | history | edited | C.S. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 400 characters in body
|
| Jun 22, 2012 at 7:59 | history | edited | C.S. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 69 characters in body
|
| Jun 22, 2012 at 7:12 | history | answered | C.S. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |