Skip to main content
4 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 25, 2012 at 17:18 vote accept passerby51
Jun 21, 2012 at 23:09 comment added passerby51 ... what I mean is I always seem to get the denominator to grow at most polynomially in $n$, hence the total number to be $e^{c n (1 - o(1)}$. Any tricks to get a $\log n$ drop in the exponent is appreciated.
Jun 21, 2012 at 23:02 comment added passerby51 @Ryan, thanks for your response. I agree that a volume argument is pretty tight. I had tried it and I guess you end up with a bound of the form $\binom{n}{k} / [ \sum_{i=0}^r \binom{k}{i} \binom{n-k}{i} ]$ on the number of points required for an $r$-covering. I am having some difficulty, evaluating this asymptotically. Some rather rough calculations seems to suggest that you cannot get reduce the number from being exponential in $n$ (say $e^{cn(1+o(1)}$) if you require $ k = \gamma n$ and do want $r$ to grow sublienar in $n$.
Jun 21, 2012 at 20:17 history answered Ryan O'Donnell CC BY-SA 3.0