Timeline for A covering problem for the Hamming cube
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 25, 2012 at 17:18 | vote | accept | passerby51 | ||
Jun 21, 2012 at 23:09 | comment | added | passerby51 | ... what I mean is I always seem to get the denominator to grow at most polynomially in $n$, hence the total number to be $e^{c n (1 - o(1)}$. Any tricks to get a $\log n$ drop in the exponent is appreciated. | |
Jun 21, 2012 at 23:02 | comment | added | passerby51 | @Ryan, thanks for your response. I agree that a volume argument is pretty tight. I had tried it and I guess you end up with a bound of the form $\binom{n}{k} / [ \sum_{i=0}^r \binom{k}{i} \binom{n-k}{i} ]$ on the number of points required for an $r$-covering. I am having some difficulty, evaluating this asymptotically. Some rather rough calculations seems to suggest that you cannot get reduce the number from being exponential in $n$ (say $e^{cn(1+o(1)}$) if you require $ k = \gamma n$ and do want $r$ to grow sublienar in $n$. | |
Jun 21, 2012 at 20:17 | history | answered | Ryan O'Donnell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |