Timeline for (p,q) versus Glivenko-Cantelli
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2012 at 13:47 | vote | accept | Henry Towsner | ||
| Jun 22, 2012 at 13:47 | history | bounty ended | Henry Towsner | ||
| Jun 19, 2012 at 21:53 | comment | added | Henry Towsner | Whether or not the convex sets form a GC class depends on the measure (I was basing the statement on "Glivenko-Cantelli Theorems for Classes of Convex Sets", which shows that they are for various measures). I guess one way to apply the (p,q) theorem would be to choose a measure for which the convex sets fail to satisfy Glivenko-Cantelli, and use that measure to construct a (p,q) family, but if that's the only way to generate (p,q) families, it doesn't address the VC dimension case, since VC sets will satisfy Glivenko-Cantelli for any measure. | |
| Jun 19, 2012 at 16:59 | history | answered | domotorp | CC BY-SA 3.0 |