Let $\mathcal P_n$ be the set of trigonometric polynomials of degree less than or equal to $n$ and let $\lVert\cdot\rVert_\infty$ be the supremum norm. The error of the best approximation of $f$ of degree $n$ is defined as
$$e_n(f)=\inf_{p\in\mathcal P_n}\lVert f-p\rVert_\infty.$$
A theorem of Bernstein says that if
$$\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{e_n(f)}n n^\alpha<\infty$$
for $\alpha>0$ then $f$ is $\alpha$-Hölder. I conjecture that this extends to the $\alpha=0$ case with the statement that $f$ is continuous and of bounded variation instead, and also that the reciprocal holds.
There's a result of Newman and Rivlin in Approximation of monomials by lower degree polynomials (the lemma starting on the bottom of the second page, p. 452) that you can use to prove that the function
$$F_k(x)=\sum_{h=0}^\infty f_k(h)\cos(hx)$$
where
$$f_k(x)=-\frac{d}{dx}\frac 1{\log^k(x)}$$
and the exponents are composition, satisfies
$$e_n\gg\frac{1}{\log(n)\log^2(n)\dotsm \log^{k-1}(n)(\log^k(n))^2}.$$
And it really looks like $\sum\frac{e_n}n$ is on the verge of diverging but doesn't quite get there.
Is the conjecture true?