3
$\begingroup$

Let $B$ be a standard Brownian motion, and $A$ a process of finite variation on compacts almost surely, not necessarily adapted to the Brownian filtration.

Question: Denoting by $\mathcal L$ the Lebesgue measure, is it true that $$\mathcal L(\{t \, | \, B_t = A_t \}) = 0$$

almost surely?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

Fix a finite interval $I$.It suffices to show that almost surely, $$\mathcal L(\{t \in I \, | \, B_t = A_t \}) = 0 \,.$$ Brownian motion restricted to $\{t \in I \, | \, B_t = A_t \}$ has bounded variation, so a positive answer is implied by the following stronger result, a special case of Theorem 1.3 of [1]:

Theorem[1] Let $\{B(t): t\in [0,1]\}$ be a standard Brownian motion. Then, almost surely, for all $S\subset [0,1]$, if $B|_{S}$ is of bounded variation, then $\overline{\dim}_M S\leq 1/2$.

Here $\overline{\dim}_M$ is the upper Minkowski dimension (a.k.a. upper box dimension.)

[1] Angel, Omer, Richárd Balka, András Máthé, and Yuval Peres. "Restrictions of Hölder continuous functions." Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 370, no. 6 (2018): 4223-4247. https://www.ams.org/journals/tran/2018-370-06/S0002-9947-2018-07126-4/S0002-9947-2018-07126-4.pdf http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/84253/7/WRAP-restrictions-continuous-functions-Peres-2018.pdf

$\endgroup$
6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Ah, I wonder if I had missed this in your Brownian motion book… $\endgroup$
    – Nate River
    Feb 4, 2022 at 7:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is not discussed in the book- the relevant work was done well after the book was published. $\endgroup$ Feb 5, 2022 at 16:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I see! Though there is actually one subtlety - the set on which $B_t = A_t$ is random, while in the theorem $S$ is deterministic. Does this affect anything at all? $\endgroup$
    – Nate River
    Feb 6, 2022 at 5:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ No, the set $S$ in the Theorem is allowed to be random (and depend on the BM). $\endgroup$ Feb 6, 2022 at 19:49
  • $\begingroup$ I have read the linked paper, and have a question about the result for Brownian motion - isn’t it true that Theorem 4.3 implies that the result for Brownian motion may be extended to the critical $\beta = \alpha$ case? Specifically, using the fact that the BM is in $\mathcal A_n (\gamma, 2)$ for all $\gamma < \alpha$ and large enough $n$, and sending $\gamma \to \alpha^-$, we deduce that almost surely there exists no set $A$ on which the BM is $\alpha$ Hölder continuous and $\bar{\text{dim}}_M (A) > 1 - \alpha$. I may be making a mistake though… $\endgroup$
    – Nate River
    May 29, 2023 at 2:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.