4
$\begingroup$

Let $X$ be a metrizable compact space and $T\colon X\to X$ a minimal homeomorphism, i.e. $$ \mathrm{orb}(x) := \{T^kx:k\in\mathbb{Z}\}$$ is dense in $X$ for every $x \in X$. Assume that the following condition is met:

  • There exist $\varepsilon_n \to 0$ and $s_n \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $d(T^{s_n}x,x) < \varepsilon_n$, for every $n \in \mathbb{N}$ and $x \in X$.

This implies that $X$ is equicontinuous? When $X$ is a subshift it is easy to see that this is true (beacuse, then, every point is periodic), but for a general system I couldn't prove it.

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ Hi, Ia writing just to signal a little typo: perhaps it is minimal, not minimial. $\endgroup$ Feb 24, 2020 at 18:20
  • $\begingroup$ Here is a relevant statement: If $T$ is an isometry and $X$ is proper, then $X$ is compact --- it is simple, but not trivial; see “On conditions under which...” by Aleksander Całka. $\endgroup$ Feb 24, 2020 at 18:29
  • $\begingroup$ @AntonPetrunin you are right! In fact in every equicontinuous system this can happen. What about if this condition implies equicontinuity? I will edit the question. $\endgroup$ Feb 24, 2020 at 18:30
  • $\begingroup$ This is called uniform topological rigidity if I recall correctly, and arxiv.org/abs/1508.03366 should contain some info. $\endgroup$
    – Ville Salo
    Feb 24, 2020 at 19:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think your specific question is answered by their statement that rigidity of minimal systems does not imply uniform rigidity, but I can't check now. $\endgroup$
    – Ville Salo
    Feb 24, 2020 at 19:16

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

In general, such a homeomorphism is not necessary equicontinuous.

The existence of such examples on $X=\mathbb{T}^2$, i.e. the $2$-torus, can be shown as follows: let $\mathcal{O}$ be the $C^\infty$ closure of the set $\{h\circ R_\alpha\circ h^{-1} : h\in\mathrm{Diff}^\infty(\mathbb{T^2}),\ \alpha\in\mathbb{T}^2\}$, where $\mathbb{T}^2$ denotes the $2$-torus and $R_\alpha : \mathbb{T}^2\ni x\mapsto x+\alpha$.

Fathi and Herman showed in

Fathi, Albert; Herman, Michael R., Existence de difféomorphismes minimaux, Astérisque 49(1977), 37-59 (1978). ZBL0374.58010.

that there is residual set $C_0\subset \mathcal{O}$ such that every diffeomorphism of $C_0$ is minimal.

On the other hand, in

Kocsard, Alejandro; Koropecki, Andrés, A mixing-like property and inexistence of invariant foliations for minimal diffeomorphisms of the 2-torus, Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 137, No. 10, 3379-3386 (2009). ZBL1179.37063.

we proved the existence of a residual set $C_1\subset\mathcal{O}$ such that any $f\in C_1$ is weak-spreading, i.e. if $\tilde f\colon\mathbb{R}^2\to\mathbb{R}^2$ is a lift of $f$, then for every non-empty open set $U\subset\mathbb{R}^2$, every $\epsilon>0$ and any $R>0$, there exist $n>0$ and a ball $B_R\subset\mathbb{R}^2$ of radius $R$ such that $\tilde f^n(U)$ is $\epsilon$-dense in $B_R$. It is clear that every weak spreading homeomorphism is not equicontinuous.

Finally, one can show that rigid diffeomorphisms are generic in $\mathcal{O}$, i.e. there is residual set $C_2\subset\mathcal{O}$ such that for every $f\in C_2$ there is a sequence of natural numbers $n_j\to \infty$ so that $f^{n_j}\to id$ in the $C^0$ uniformly, when $j\to \infty$.

So, any diffeomorphism in $C_0\cap C_1\cap C_2$ is minimal and rigid, but not equicontinuous.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much! $\endgroup$ Feb 24, 2020 at 23:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.