18
$\begingroup$

For this question I will let the overly ambiguous word curve mean: smooth projective and connected curve over $\mathbb C$ (or equivalently a smooth compact Riemann-Surface).

Let $C$ be a curve over $\mathbb C$. And suppose that $f: D \to C$ and $g:D \to E$ are dominant maps of curves. Then the pair $(f,g)$ forms a correspondence from $C$ to $E$, and one gets a map between Jacobians $f_* \circ g^* : J(E) \to J(C)$. Then the image of $J(E)$ under this map is going to be a sub-abelian variety of $J(C)$.

My questions is, is it possible to get all simple sub-abelian varieties of $J(C)$ from correspondences in this way?

$\endgroup$
6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ give me a start here. what makes this seem plausible? $\endgroup$
    – roy smith
    Oct 20, 2015 at 3:30
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ It does seem pretty plausible. First, any morphism $J(E)\to J(C)$ comes from a line bundle on $C\times E$, which in turns comes from a divisor in $C\times E$... Which is kind of a curve (probably singular, but we can resolve this, also probably reducible, which is more annoying). Secondly, for any abelian variety $A$, we can find a curve $E\subset A$ that generates it (again, the obvious construction gives a reducible curve, so some argument would be required?), and then $A$ becomes a quotient of $J(E)$. Combining these two facts we'd get the required claim. $\endgroup$
    – t3suji
    Oct 20, 2015 at 5:14
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ P.S. A reference for the second fact: Theorem III.10.1 of Milne's jmilne.org/math/CourseNotes/AV.pdf (the section has the telling title `Abelian varieties are quotients of Jacobian varieties :) And the first fact should follow from Bertini's Theorem... $\endgroup$
    – t3suji
    Oct 20, 2015 at 5:22
  • $\begingroup$ @roysmith: I have no idea wether this is something plausible. I just know one important case, namely that it is true for modular curves if one does it over $\mathbb Q$ instead of over $\mathbb C$ (at least if one does not demand that correspondences are given by irreducible curves). So a related question is: how big is the subring of ${\rm End}_{\mathbb C} J(C)$ generated by correspondences from $C$ to itself? $\endgroup$ Oct 20, 2015 at 21:20
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Maarten Derickx: No, I don't, but it does not seem particularly hard. Fix base points $e\in E$, $c\in C$, we need to show that for any line bundle $L$ on $E\times C$, there exist $n_1$ and $n_2$ such that the line bundle $L(n_1(\{e\}\times C)+n_2(E\times \{c\}))$ is of the form $O(D)$ for smooth curve $D\subset E\times C$ (which then gives a correspondence between the two curves). However, $O((\{e\}\times C)+(E\times \{c\}))$ is ample, therefore, $L(n(\{e\}\times C)+n(E\times \{c\}))$ is very ample for $n\gg 0$, and the claim follows from Bertini's Theorem. $\endgroup$
    – t3suji
    Oct 21, 2015 at 1:50

1 Answer 1

10
+50
$\begingroup$

This argument is mostly contained in t3suji's comments, but with some of the proofs somewhat expanded.

As a convention (consistent with that of the theory of Chow motives), all actions of correspondences $\alpha \in \operatorname{CH}^*(X \times Y)$ on cohomology (or Jacobians) are covariant: $\alpha_* \colon H^*(X) \to H^*(Y)$, etc.

Lemma. If $X$ and $Y$ are smooth projective varieties over $\mathbb C$, then there is an isomorphism $$\operatorname{NS}(X \times Y) \cong \operatorname{NS}(X) \times \operatorname{NS}(Y) \times \operatorname{Hom}(\operatorname{Alb}_X,\operatorname{Pic}^0_Y).\label{Eq NS}\tag{1}$$

Proof. The Künneth formula gives an isomorphism of $\mathbb Z$-Hodge structures $$H^2(X \times Y) = \big( H^2(X) \otimes H^0(Y)\big) \oplus \big( H^0(X) \otimes H^2(Y) \big) \oplus \big( H^1(X) \otimes H^1(Y) \big).\tag{2}\label{Eq Künneth}$$ By Poincaré duality, the last term equals $\operatorname{Hom}(H^{2\dim X-1}(X),H^1(Y))$. Taking $(1,1)$-parts in (\ref{Eq Künneth}) gives the result by Lefschetz's (1,1) theorem and the theory of abelian varieties over $\mathbb C$. $\square$

There is also a version for $\operatorname{Pic}$ for smooth projective varieties over an arbitrary field (or even over a base, under some mild hypotheses to ensure existence of $\operatorname{\textbf{Pic}}_{X/S}$ and $\operatorname{\textbf{Alb}}_{X/S}$). The above analytic proof has the advantage that it shows us how classes act on Jacobians: if $X$ and $Y$ are curves, then $\operatorname{Alb}_X \cong \operatorname{Pic}_X^0 \cong \operatorname{Jac}_X$, and under these identifications, a class $\alpha \in \operatorname{CH}^1(X \times Y)$ induces the map $\alpha_* \colon \operatorname{Jac}_X \to \operatorname{Jac}_Y$ given by the corrresponding component of $\alpha$ under (\ref{Eq NS}).

Construction. Let $A \subseteq \operatorname{Jac}_C$ be any abelian subvariety. Let $E$ be any curve admitting a surjection $\operatorname{Jac}_E \to A$; for example, $E = C$ with the projection $\operatorname{Jac}_C \to A$ given by $n \pi$ for $\pi \in \operatorname{End}^\circ(\operatorname{Jac}_C)$ the projector corresponding to the isogeny factor $A$ of $\operatorname{Jac}_C$, and $n \in \mathbb Z_{> 0}$ such that $n\pi$ is integral. The composition gives a morphism $\phi \colon \operatorname{Jac}_E \to \operatorname{Jac}_C$, corresponding by (\ref{Eq NS}) to a class $\alpha \in \operatorname{NS}(X \times Y)$.

The class $(1,1,0)$ in (\ref{Eq NS}) is ample, hence for some $n \gg 0$ there exists a very ample line bundle $\mathscr L$ on $X \times Y$ mapping to $(n,n,\alpha) \in \operatorname{NS}(X \times Y)$. Let $D \in |\mathscr L|$ be a smooth member. By the discussion above, the cycle $[D] \in \operatorname{CH}^1(E \times C)$ induces the map $\phi$.

The graphs of the maps $g \colon D \to E$ and $f \colon D \to C$ give cycles $[\Gamma_g]^\top \in \operatorname{CH}^1(E \times D)$ and $[\Gamma_f] \in \operatorname{CH}^1(D \times C)$, whose actions on $\operatorname{Jac}$ are given by $g^*$ and $f_*$ respectively. Moreover, we have $$[\Gamma_g]^\top \circ [\Gamma_f] = [D] \in \operatorname{CH}^1(E \times C),$$ which shows that indeed $\phi = f_* \circ g^*$. $\square$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.