22
$\begingroup$

What is the origin of the Ramanujan's approximate identity $$\pi^4\approx 2143/22,\;\;\tag 1$$ which is valid with $10^{-9}$ relative accuracy? For comparison, the relative accuracy of the well known $\pi\approx 22/7$ is only $4\cdot10^{-4}$ and in this case we have the identity $$\frac{22}{7} - \pi = \int_0^1 (x-x^2)^4 \frac{dx}{1+x^2}, \tag{2}$$ which explains why the difference is small (concerning this identity, see Source and context of $\frac{22}{7} - \pi = \int_0^1 (x-x^2)^4 dx/(1+x^2)$?).

Of course, (1) can be rewritten in the form $$\zeta(4)\approx 2143/1980,$$ so maybe some fast convergent series for $\zeta(4)$ can be used to get this approximate identity (in the case of $\frac{22}{7}-\pi$, a series counterpart of (2) is $$\sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{240}{(4k+5)(4k+6)(4k+7)(4k+9)(4k+10)(4k+11)}=\frac{22}{7}-\pi$$ - see Source and context of $\frac{22}{7} - \pi = \int_0^1 (x-x^2)^4 dx/(1+x^2)$?).

P.S. I just discovered that this question was discussed in https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1359015/is-there-an-integral-for-pi4-frac214322 and in https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1649890/is-there-a-series-to-show-22-pi42143 is anything to add to the answers given there?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ This is convergent of the continued fraction starting $[97; 2, 2, 3, 1, 16539, 1, 6, 3]$. The large $16539$ might explain it. $\endgroup$
    – joro
    Feb 26, 2016 at 8:51
  • 21
    $\begingroup$ Large 16539 is a question, not an answer. $\endgroup$ Feb 26, 2016 at 9:20
  • $\begingroup$ You get an even larger second term in the continued fraction for 22 pi^4 = [2143, 363893, 1, ...]. $\endgroup$
    – Max
    Jun 21, 2022 at 16:04

3 Answers 3

23
$\begingroup$

I think Ramanujan's thought was very simple. He calculated the decimal expansion of $\pi^4$ and he got: $$\pi^4 = 97.409091034... \approx 97.4090909...= 97.4 +1/110$$
And then: $$ 97.4 + 1/110 = 10715/110 = 2143/22$$

$\endgroup$
5
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ This is a very nice observation and leads to a question why $10\pi^4-1/11\approx 974.0000012$ is a near integer. $\endgroup$ Feb 26, 2016 at 11:22
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ How do you know he looked at patterns in the decimal expansion instead of finding rational approximations in the usual way (as joro said in a comment to the question, $2143/22$ is just a convergent to the continued fraction)? $\endgroup$ Feb 26, 2016 at 17:23
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I think it's the most natural way. I found very good article : Ramanujan for lowbrows. Berndt and Bhargava discussed about OP and other problems. $\endgroup$
    – user68208
    Feb 27, 2016 at 0:16
  • $\begingroup$ We may want to add another unit fraction to obtain $5\pi^4-\frac{1}{2·11}-\frac{1}{2^9 5^5} \approx 486.99999999955$ $\endgroup$ Mar 10, 2016 at 16:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ that looks very probable but actually I found a source which explains the different way Ramanujan found it, see my answer $\endgroup$
    – Max
    Jun 21, 2022 at 16:14
5
$\begingroup$

Perhaps the most intuitive way of explaining this identity is with the help of a continued fraction $$ 97+\frac{1}{2+\frac{1}{2+\frac{1}{3+\frac{1}{1+\frac{1}{16539+\frac{1}{\ddots}}}}}} $$ The unexpectedly large partial quotient of 16539 means that using all partial quotients up to (but not including) this value gives an incredibly close approximation of $\pi^4$ given the number of terms used. What this large number means essentially is that it takes a denominator of that many times more than the previous in order to obtain a better approximation, implying that the previous denominator is a really close approximation. The same method can be used to show that 355/113 is a very close approximation of $\pi$ for the number of partial quotients used.

Evaluating the truncation $$ 97+\frac{1}{2+\frac{1}{2+\frac{1}{3+\frac{1}{1}}}} $$ gives the famous approximation of $\frac{2143}{22}$ for $\pi^4$.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

FWIW, I found a source according to which

He found this by first squaring the square of π which gives 97.40909103…, then by subtracting 9^2 = 81 he got 16.40909103…, multiplying this by 22 he got 361.0000027…, 361 being the square of 19.

(Thereafter, the source compares to the alternate "method" mentioned in the earlier answer, π^4 = 97.40909103... ≈ 97.409090909...)

The Wikipedia page "Approximations of π" cites his "Lost notebook page 16"

from Ramanujan, who claimed the Goddess of Namagiri appeared to him in a dream and told him the true value of π.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.