-2
$\begingroup$

If $M=G/H$ is a reductive space and $\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{h}+\mathfrak{m}$ be the canonical decomposition, then are $\mathfrak{g}$ or $\mathfrak{h}$ or both reductive lie algebras? (in this case, where can I find a proof?)

It is for every ideal $ \mathfrak{a}$ of $\mathfrak{g}$ there exists an ideal $ \mathfrak{b}$ sucht that $\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{a}+\mathfrak{b}$ or equivalently the adjoint representation is semi-simple

$\endgroup$
3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ What is a reductive space? $\endgroup$ Feb 23, 2015 at 4:10
  • $\begingroup$ @MikhailBorovoi According to encyclopedias it means that $\mathfrak h$ $H$-equivariantly splits out of $\mathfrak g$. $\endgroup$ Feb 23, 2015 at 8:45
  • $\begingroup$ Also I think $G$ and $H$ must be reductive groups, with $H$ closed subgroup of $G$ (so that $G/H$ is a reductive space means $(G,H)$ is a reductive pair). $\endgroup$ Feb 23, 2015 at 8:51

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

It depends on the definition of a reductive space $G/H$. Some authors require that in addition to $\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{h}+\mathfrak{m}$, $[\mathfrak{h},\mathfrak{m}]\subseteq \mathfrak{m}$, we have that $(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{h})$ is a reductive pair of Lie algebras, by which they mean that $\mathfrak{g}$ is reductive, and $\mathfrak{h}$ is reductive in $\mathfrak{g}$. In this case, since $\mathfrak{h}$ is a $\mathfrak{h}$-submodule of $\mathfrak{g}$, this would imply that $\mathfrak{h}$ itself is reductive.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ but for example take $\mathfrak{g}=e_{1}+e_{2}$ as a vector space and the commutator $[e_{1},e_{2}]=e_{2}$ then $\mathfrak{g}$ is not a reductive lie algebra and take $\mathfrak{h}=e_{1}$ then $Lie(\mathfrak{g})/Lie(\mathfrak{h})$ Is a reductive space $\endgroup$
    – user66943
    Feb 23, 2015 at 16:27
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, it depends on the definition. Do you have a reference where your example $Lie(g)/Lie(h)$ is called a reductive space ? $\endgroup$ Feb 24, 2015 at 10:21
  • $\begingroup$ @user66943: Your notation such as $Lie(\mathfrak{g})$ seems out of control here. And as Dietrich points out, precise definitions are needed. $\endgroup$ Feb 24, 2015 at 19:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.