3
$\begingroup$

We consider $n\times n$ complex matrices. Let $i_+(A), i_-(A), i_0(A)$ be the number of eigenvalues of $A$ with positive real part, negative real part and pure imaginary. It is well known if two Hermitian matrices $A$ and $B$ are $*-$congruent, then $$(i_+(A), i_-(A), i_0(A))=(i_+(B), i_-(B), i_0(B)).\qquad{(1)}$$ If two general matrices $A$ and $B$ are $*-$congruent, (1) may not hold (can you provide an example?). Moreover, whether a matrix and its transpose are always $*-$congruent?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ What do you mean by "But I have come up a counterexample for this"? Counter-example for what? Also, what do you mean by *-congruent? $\endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Mar 8, 2010 at 2:02
  • $\begingroup$ Really sorry. I mean I'd like to see a counterexample such that (1) does not hold when $A$ and $B$ are not Hermitian matrices. $\endgroup$
    – Sunni
    Mar 8, 2010 at 2:14
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ A and B are $*$-congruent if there is an invertible matrix C such that $B=CAC^*$. $\endgroup$ Mar 8, 2010 at 2:45

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

An answer to the second question: Yes, a square complex matrix is always $*$-congruent to its transpose, according to a more general result proved by Horn and Sergeichuk in "Congruences of a square matrix and its transpose". They prove the result for all fields with involution in characteristic other than 2.

Added: Here's a counterexample for your first question:

$\left( \begin{matrix} 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 1 \end{matrix} \right) \left( \begin{matrix} 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 \end{matrix} \right) \left( \begin{matrix} 1 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 \end{matrix} \right) = \left( \begin{matrix} 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 \end{matrix} \right)$.

$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.