MathOverflow will be down for maintenance for approximately 3 hours, starting Monday evening (06/24/2013) at approximately 9:00 PM Eastern time (UTC-4).

Laurent Moret-Bailly

7,356
Reputation
3411 views
Is this your account?

Registered User 

Name Laurent Moret-Bailly
Member for 2 years
Seen 1 hour ago
Website
Location Rennes, France
Age 61
Jun
15
answered Schemes over a noetherian local ring and its completion
May
21
comment Degree of a finite locally free group scheme over a base scheme of characteristic p
OK if "connected" means "with connected fibers". But I suspect the OP means "connected" literally.
May
12
awarded  Enlightened
May
12
awarded  Nice Answer
May
12
comment First order decidability of rings vs Diophantine decidability
@SJR: I agree, but my feeling is also (for the same reason) that examples should be easier to come by.
May
9
comment First order decidability of rings vs Diophantine decidability
@SJR: Thanks for this nice example. It is in a sense a bit disappointing since a key point here, as was noted in the comments, is the choice of $\mathbb{Z}$ as the subring of coefficients. In fact, if we choose $\mathbb{Q}(t)$ instead, then the existential theory of $\mathbb{R}(t)$ is not e.c: this goes back at least to Denef. What surprises me here is the first order undecidability without extra constants.
May
7
revised First order decidability of rings vs Diophantine decidability
edited tags
May
6
awarded  Nice Question
May
6
comment First order decidability of rings vs Diophantine decidability
As SJR notes, I guess equations should have coefficients in some fixed (recursive) subring of $R$ in order for decidability to make sense. Likewise, first order formulas are in the language of rings augmented with constants from such a subring.
May
6
asked First order decidability of rings vs Diophantine decidability
May
2
comment morphism between two elliptic curves over a local field
It is not trivial since there are always quadratic twists (besides, is not a group!). The point here is that any nontrivial twist of $X$ must have bad reduction.
May
1
accepted Example of codim 1 regular embedding that is not an effective Cartier divisor?
May
1
answered Example of codim 1 regular embedding that is not an effective Cartier divisor?
May
1
accepted morphism between two elliptic curves over a local field
May
1
answered morphism between two elliptic curves over a local field
Apr
24
accepted Dimension of formal fiber
Apr
23
comment The notion of multiplicity in algebraic geometry
With the notation in the definition of $\overline{\mu}$, assume $P$ is a singular point. Then in general there is an $f\in\mathcal{O}_{X,P}$ such that $\mu_f(I)=1$, but none such that $\overline{\mu}_f(I)=1$.
Apr
23
comment Bound for the degree of the field of definition for a closed point of a variety
There is something wrong with your TeX. The math doesn't show properly: specifically, the math italic alphabetic characters don't show at all.
Apr
22
comment Dimension of formal fiber
Standard fact in commutative algebra: Let $A$ be a noetherian ring (I am not sure about the minimal assumptions), $J$ an ideal such that $A$ is $J$-adically complete and separated. Let $M$ be an $A$-module. If $M$ is $J$-adically complete and separated and $M/JM$ is finitely generated, then $M$ is finitely generated. Apply this to $A=\mathbb{C}[[f_1,\dots,f_d]]$, $J=(f_1,\dots,f_d)$ and $M=\mathbb{C}[[t]]$. Things are even simpler if, say, $f_1$ is a uniformizer in $\mathbb{C}[[t]]$: then it is easy to see directly that $\mathbb{C}[[f_1]]=\mathbb{C}[[t]]$.
Apr
21
comment Kawamata-Viehweg Vanishing Theorem for Excellent Surfaces
@Omprokash Das: it is not true in general that you can embed $k(x)$ into $\mathcal{O}_{X,x}$ or even into the function field of $X$. Example: assume $k$ is not algebraically closed, take $X=\mathbb{P}^n_k$ and take for $x$ a closed point with residue field $\neq k$. Variant: same $X$ ($n\geq2$, $k$ arbitrary), $x$= generic point of a non-unirational subvariety, e.g. a curve of positive genus.
Apr
20
comment Kawamata-Viehweg Vanishing Theorem for Excellent Surfaces
I don't understand "over $k(x)$". Clearly $S$ is a two-dimensional local scheme with closed point $\mathrm{Spec}\,k(x)$, but in general it is not a $k(x)$-scheme in any natural way.
Apr
19
comment Equivalent definitions of ample bundles
@Serge: the question is what is meant by "generate the stalk". With your phrasing, it should mean "generate the stalk $E_x$ as an $\mathcal{O}_{X,x}$-module". And then of course it is true for $E=\mathcal{O}_{X}$. In condition 1 of the question, "$E_x$" should be understood as the stalk at $x$ tensored with the residue field. An even then, that version of the definition works only if you work with rational points over an algebraically closed field.
Apr
19
comment Equivalent definitions of ample bundles
@Serge: $\mathcal{O}_X$ is always globally generated!
Apr
16
answered Dimension of formal fiber
Apr
6
comment Finite extensions of residue fields of Henselian DVRs
Maybe I misunderstand the question, but what if you start with an extension $L/F$ which is not simple and then take $K=F((t))$?
Apr
2
comment Is the image of discrete set under an open map discrete?
@Nik: Oops, sorry.
Apr
2
comment Is the image of discrete set under an open map discrete?
Here is a simpler one: if $t\in\mathbb{R}$ is irrational, the image of $t\mathbb{Z}$ under the projection $\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z}$ is not discrete.
Mar
7
comment Is the universal closed subscheme reduced?
The $G$-invariant part of a reduced scheme is not reduced in general: take $\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$ acting on the curve $xy=0$ by exchanging coordinates.
Mar
6
accepted Open idempotents in modules over a local ring
Mar
6
revised Open idempotents in modules over a local ring
added 360 characters in body
Mar
6
revised Open idempotents in modules over a local ring
added 767 characters in body
Mar
6
answered Open idempotents in modules over a local ring
Mar
6
revised Which schemes can be presented as limits of smooth varieties?
deleted 12 characters in body
Mar
6
comment Which schemes can be presented as limits of smooth varieties?
I didn't say the morphisms were dominant. That would mean $B$ is the direct limit of its smooth subalgebras, a much stronger condition, it seems. And I know nothing about the non-affine case.
Mar
6
answered Which schemes can be presented as limits of smooth varieties?
Mar
4
accepted Artin approximation theorems over non-regular rings/non-Noetherian rings
Feb
28
answered Artin approximation theorems over non-regular rings/non-Noetherian rings
Feb
19
comment Zero-cohomology of birational varieties
As you define it, $f_*$ depends on the choice of $U_1$.
Feb
18
comment Formal power series over a henselian ring
More generally: if $A$ is a local ring and $I$ an ideal such that $A$ is $I$-adically complete and separated, then $A$ is henselian if (and only if!) $A/I$ is henselian. This is easy by observing that each $A_n:=A/I^n$ is henselian (because $A_{n,\mathrm{red}}$ is) and then inductively lifting roots to $A$. See Raynaud, LNM 169, I, §2 where this result is given as an exercise.
Feb
16
comment Are f.g. projective modules free over total quotient ring of a reduced non-noetherian commutative ring
This ring is local, so projective=free.
Feb
11
comment Open subset in the flat topology on Spec(R)
The only Zariski neighborhood of the closed point in a local scheme $X$ is $X$. So, $U=\mathrm{Spec\,}(R_P)$ and your condition just means that $S$ is stable under generalization.
Feb
10
comment Complementation in an extension field
It is well known that if $\mathbb{Q}$ is complemented in $\mathbb{R}$ you get nonmeasurable sets in $\mathbb{R}$. I don't think you can get this without some form of AC.
Feb
8
comment on trivialisation of T-torsors
And what is $x$?
Feb
6
accepted Are noetherian schemes generically Jacobson?
Feb
6
revised Are noetherian schemes generically Jacobson?
added 58 characters in body
Feb
5
answered Are noetherian schemes generically Jacobson?
Feb
5
accepted purity for finite flat group schemes
Feb
5
answered purity for finite flat group schemes
Feb
4
revised Are rational varieties simply connected?
added 669 characters in body
Feb
4
awarded  ag.algebraic-geometry