Francesco Polizzi

18,905
Reputation
4471 views
Is this your account?

Registered User 

Name Francesco Polizzi
Member for 2 years
Seen 20 mins ago
Website
Location
Age
9h
revised Surfaces ruled over elliptic curves
added 35 characters in body
10h
accepted Surfaces ruled over elliptic curves
11h
revised Surfaces ruled over elliptic curves
added 1107 characters in body; added 1 characters in body
11h
comment Surfaces ruled over elliptic curves
@Will: thank you, this is precisely the part I was missing :-)
1d
answered Surfaces ruled over elliptic curves
2d
accepted Basics of minimal Elliptic Surfaces [following Beauville]
2d
revised Basics of minimal Elliptic Surfaces [following Beauville]
added 31 characters in body
2d
revised Basics of minimal Elliptic Surfaces [following Beauville]
added 386 characters in body
2d
answered Basics of minimal Elliptic Surfaces [following Beauville]
May
13
awarded  Enlightened
May
13
awarded  Nice Answer
May
13
comment Proving that a generic variety with ample canonical bundle has no automorphisms
I have added some further details
May
13
revised Proving that a generic variety with ample canonical bundle has no automorphisms
added 611 characters in body; added 6 characters in body
May
12
accepted Proving that a generic variety with ample canonical bundle has no automorphisms
May
12
comment Proving that a generic variety with ample canonical bundle has no automorphisms
@Jonathan: 1. If you take the branch locus in a very ample linear system, by Bertini theorem the general element of the system will be smooth, hence the general cover will be smooth. 2. By the universal property of the Albanese map, the cover $\alpha \colon X \to A$ factors through the Albanese morphism $X \to \textrm{Alb}(X)$. Since $\deg \alpha =2$ and $X$ is of general type, the isogeny $\textrm{Alb}(X) \to A$ must be an isomorphism. 3. $X$ has non trivial deformations coming from the deformations of $A$ (and from those of the branch locus).
May
12
comment Proving that a generic variety with ample canonical bundle has no automorphisms
If you want a rigid (= without deformations) counterexample, maybe some fake projective plane could work.
May
12
answered Proving that a generic variety with ample canonical bundle has no automorphisms
May
8
revised regularity of finite flat branched covers
deleted 73 characters in body
May
8
comment regularity of finite flat branched covers
Alternatively, one can use Hurwitz formula to define the branch locus, at least when $C$ is Gorenstein. In fact, $K_C = f^*K_S + R$, where $R$ is the ramification divisor. Then $D=f_*R$ as a cycle, so it makes sense to speak of non-reduced branch divisor. For instance, in Joel example the ramification divisor is the intersection of the two lines. It is linearly equivalent to a general fibre of the covering, which is given by two distinct points sent by $f$ to the same point. So $f_*R=D$ is a point counted with multiplicity two.
May
8
comment regularity of finite flat branched covers
Ok, so let use the following definition that can be found in the paper by Iversen "Numerical invariants of multiple planes", p. 971. Let $x \in S$ and $y_1, \ldots, y_r$ be the points of $f^{-1}x$. Let $d_i$ be the discriminant of the extension $\widehat{\mathcal{O}_x} \to \widehat{\mathcal{O}_{y_i}}$. Then a local equation of $D$ in $x$ is given by $\prod d_i$.
May
8
revised regularity of finite flat branched covers
deleted 326 characters in body; added 14 characters in body; added 33 characters in body
May
8
comment regularity of finite flat branched covers
Joel: right. Anyway, in your example the schematic branch locus is not reduced (is one point counted with multiplicity two). Indeed, your cover is the limit of a family of flat double covers $f_t \colon \mathbb{P}^1 \to \mathbb{P}^1$, all branched in two points, when the two points come together.
May
8
answered regularity of finite flat branched covers
May
3
revised Reference for the classification of (singular) degree 4 surfaces in $\mathbb{P}^3_{\mathbb{C}}$?
edited title
May
3
answered Reference for the classification of (singular) degree 4 surfaces in $\mathbb{P}^3_{\mathbb{C}}$?
May
3
comment The prime number $2$
Actually, because it is so even
Apr
24
comment Simplest complex curves with isomorphic Jacobian
You are welcome. Right, it is not clear what "simplest" should mean in this case. At any rate, in Howe's paper there are examples given by pairs of genus $2$ curves, which is of course the lowest possible genus. In this sense, such examples might be considered "simple".
Apr
24
accepted Simplest complex curves with isomorphic Jacobian
Apr
24
answered Simplest complex curves with isomorphic Jacobian
Apr
22
comment Morphism with non-reduced special fibre
I took the liberty to change the title.
Apr
22
accepted Is $\pi_1(\widetilde{X/G})$ always finite if $\pi_1(X)$ is finite?
Apr
21
revised Is $\pi_1(\widetilde{X/G})$ always finite if $\pi_1(X)$ is finite?
edited body
Apr
21
revised Is $\pi_1(\widetilde{X/G})$ always finite if $\pi_1(X)$ is finite?
added 213 characters in body; added 10 characters in body; deleted 1 characters in body
Apr
21
answered Is $\pi_1(\widetilde{X/G})$ always finite if $\pi_1(X)$ is finite?
Apr
19
comment Equivalent definitions of ample bundles
@Serge: the definition of Hartshorne, page 121 is clear: $E$ is generated by global sections if and only if it is a quotient of a free sheaf, i.e. a quotient of a direct sum of copies of $\mathcal{O}_X$. And $\mathcal{O}_X$ of course has this property!
Apr
19
comment Equivalent definitions of ample bundles
@Serge: If you take $E= \mathcal{O}_X$ and a point $x \in X$, from the exact sequence $$0 \to \mathcal{O}_X(-x) \to \mathcal{O}_X \to \mathcal{O}_x \to 0$$ you see immediately that, since $H^0(\mathcal{O}_X(-x))=0$, the map $H^0(\mathcal{O}_X) \to H^0(\mathcal{O}_x)$ is an isomorphism, so $(1)$ is satisfied.
Apr
19
revised Equivalent definitions of ample bundles
added 84 characters in body
Apr
19
answered Equivalent definitions of ample bundles
Apr
17
answered Albanese dual to the Picard scheme
Apr
11
comment Are period domains ever contractible
"half-space", "half-plane": what do you think?
Apr
9
accepted Minimal compactification
Apr
9
revised Minimal compactification
deleted 12 characters in body
Apr
9
answered Minimal compactification
Apr
4
revised Linkage between singularities of algebraic varieties and continued fractions
edited title
Apr
4
comment Linkage between singularities of algebraic varieties and continued fractions
You can have a look at Section 2 of my paper with E. Mistretta: arxiv.org/abs/0805.1424 where the case of dimension $2$ cyclic quotient singularities is considered. Sorry for being self-referential :-)
Apr
3
comment What is the definition of a sufficiently ample line bundle?
Maybe you should say where precisely in the book you found this concept...
Apr
3
comment who invented projective space $\mathbb{P}^n$?
I do not know. Anyway, it seems that homogeneous coordinates were introduced by Moebius en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homogeneous_coordinates
Apr
3
comment Existence of smooth surfaces containing a curve
mmh...so maybe after all there is still a mistake in my argument. Probably it is the following: for any $p \in C$ the set given by the surfaces in $I_C(d)$ which are smooth at $p$ is an open (hence dense) subset $U_p \subseteq |I_C(d)|$. But then it is possible that $\bigcap_{p \in C} U_p = \emptyset$. Is it this what you are saying?
Apr
3
comment Existence of smooth surfaces containing a curve
@Olivier: it seems to me that the argument proving that the base locus of $I_C(d)$ consists of $C$ only (for $d >>0$) assumes that $C$ is considered with its reduced structure, and that it cannot be carried out if instead $C$ has some nilpotent structure (as Jason's example shows). I'm missing something?
Apr
3
revised Existence of smooth surfaces containing a curve
added 42 characters in body; added 9 characters in body